I am talking from a cash flow perspective...leasing is going to be cheaper than buying
If you save 30-40% a month by leasing and the terms of the lease can work in your business...then its a good reason to do so
I am not sure where you are getting your data on car allowance vs company car?
I can name you several Fortune 50 companies that still use company car fleets...especially for the sales organization
Check out ANY pharmaceutical company as an example.
I disagree in the cash flow aspect. If cash flow is a problem, get a car loan. But obviously leasing is a lot more convenient then getting a loan, keeping track of depreciation expense (for both financial accounting and tax accounting) and in disposing of the car. All of these things take people, which can be expensive for more than few cars.
As far as car allowance, I was not talking about sales people who are virtually 100% on the road. I was talking about others who drive only some of the time for company business. Also, when I had to drive my car for company business (at several large companies) I just charged the mileage allowance on my expense report (current IRS rate is $0.575 per mile). In addition, many executives get a car allowance, and they don't drive any more than regular employees who commute back and forth the work each day.
seriously?
what would you bet?..
What I will say is that companies..including mine, and at least 5 other Fortune 50 companies I could name where I have friends....do not manage their own fleets anymore
They would rather pay an outside company to provide the service and pay an all inclusive fee...excluding gasoline
One would think this would be more expensive than managing your own...but never the less I can testify that this has been what I have seen in my experience
Warren
Since I admitted right off the bat that I may be wrong, I would not bet much.
But maybe you didn't understand what I said. I never said that companies manage their own fleets. I said that probably, if you are sure GE is leasing the cars from someone, and then leasing to you, then they may be leasing from another division in GE that does leasing, since leasing has been one of their businesses for a long time. However, recently GE is getting out of that business so maybe the leasing is not in GE anymore.
The bottom line is that there are companies that make money by purchasing assets and leasing them. In most cases, the company has to borrow money to purchase the asset before leasing them, so it is not a question of cash flow. They make a profit doing that. It is not just a question of "marking up" the payments, rather purchasing assets and then depreciation has certain tax benefits over leasing. Examples, of such companies are REIT's (real estate investment trusts, cargo shipping container companies, jet aircraft leased to major airlines, etc). GE was in the leasing business, but is getting out (not sure if they are already completely out).
This whole discussion started as question about tax benefits of leasing. My point is that it is folklore that leasing has tax benefits over purchasing. I was a licensed CPA for over 20 years, so I know a little about this.
Saying that there are other non-tax benefits may be true in some respects (we outsource a lot of things to experts or those who have economy of scale), but is misleading, because the leasing companies are making money or they would not be in business.