• Car enthusiast? Join us on Cars Connected! iOS | Android | Desktop
  • Hint: Use a descriptive title for your new message
    If you're looking for help and want to draw people in who can assist you, use a descriptive subject title when posting your message. In other words, "I need help with my car" could be about anything and can easily be overlooked by people who can help. However, "I need help with my transmission" will draw interest from people who can help with a transmission specific issue. Be as descriptive as you can. Please also post in the appropriate forum. The "Lounge" is for introducing yourself. If you need help with your G70, please post in the G70 section - and so on... This message can be closed by clicking the X in the top right corner.

2010 almost certainly will have suspension changes

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am new to the board. I have a 2009 Genesis 4.6 and have talked with the dealership and corporate regarding the rough ride. I have even requested the specifications of the rear shocks and springs because I have a local suspension shop that can change out the springs to a softer load. Unfortunately, Hyundai cant even get me the specifications so that I can spend the money to get a better ride. Does anyone know how I can get this information. I really like the car but cannot deal with the rough ride.
 
I am new to the board. I have a 2009 Genesis 4.6 and have talked with the dealership and corporate regarding the rough ride. I have even requested the specifications of the rear shocks and springs because I have a local suspension shop that can change out the springs to a softer load. Unfortunately, Hyundai cant even get me the specifications so that I can spend the money to get a better ride. Does anyone know how I can get this information. I really like the car but cannot deal with the rough ride.

Let me know if you are able to find out anything for getting a better ride.
I am thinking more and more that the Genesis had to have had some changes some where in the first year. I think those that like the ride are just experiancing a nice firm well balanced ride. Then there are some of us that are getting a teeter totter effect from the front to rear axles (porpoising was another term used).

This effect naturally is amplified tremdously when your talking rough expansion joints or any wash board effects running the full width of the road. Do I hate my 4.6 Genesis? Of course not I am just going to try and do something to get a better ride out of it.

I will say this, while I thought the ride was rough up front, it wasn't until last weekend that I actually rode in the back seat of my car for the first time and found out first hand what my wife, son, elderly parents, and good friends were all complaining about.

It appeared to me that the ride in the rear seat was almost twice as bad as the front seats! I don't know.... it reminded me of riding in the very back of a school bus but not quite that severe.

It was one thing for me to think the car had a rough ride but to have to swallow your pride due to what others say hurts more! My parents are 80 years old and I had taken them on a trip up to a 50th wedding aniversary and were only talking 60 miles one way. They sat in the back seat. There was plenty of complaining going on. I found out once again that the rear cup holders are dangerous unless you have your drinks completely sealed or you get liquid spills all to easily. Strangely enough I haven't had any spills resulting from the front cup holders. This was on a highway where we were being passed by people going 70 mph. The condition of the highway was not bad. It had rougher expansion joints but that isn't all that unusual and I have drove the same road many times in my old 2006 Azera and my current 2006 Elantra with my parents in the back and it was never even brought up as conversation in either of those cars.

I'm suppose to take my parents to Missouri over Memorial Day weekend to decorate some family that is buried there. It will be a 320 mile round trip which we always just do in one day. Dad called me last night and told me that he insists that I take his Buick. He wouldn't say why but I know why because I have always taken my cars when making the trip other years.

We have some close friends that we go out with fairly often. We had always taken turns driving when going out. We took my Genesis right after we got it one night and that was the last time they would let us drive. I remember my friends wife saying shortly after we left "my god this ride is rougher than our GMC Yukon.

So my thing is I haven't been complaining as bad as everyone else and that gets to me. I will say that for being 50 years old it does have the second roughest ride of the 23 or so cars that I have owned. Number one roughest ride was my old 1971 Pontiac GTO that I had jacked up in the back with a lift kit so that I could put wide tires on it. Before I did that it wasn't to bad but afterwards it was a lumber wagon. Back then however the look was cooler than the ride.

I'm just waiting to see if I can get the 2010 suspension update done to mine if there is that update for sure? I just think we should all have an open mind on this. Those that have a Genesis that they think rides good that is great news and they should share it here. If some people are getting something other than what they think is considered normal I think it should be shared here as well. This forum is doing just what it's suppose to. It helps inform other people and you know what if you do have a problem it is nice to be able to discuss it with others right here.

Let's not cut one another down because of different circumstances. After all out of 1000's of cars not every one is going to act the exact same. Hopefully though by going through all the comments on this forum you can find out by percentages on how to look at the Genesis. For the most part it is well liked. For some of us the ride is terrible but rather than go after these people just take it for what it is worth and formulate your own opinion. I still think it's important to get information from all sides.
 
I am new to the board. I have a 2009 Genesis 4.6 and have talked with the dealership and corporate regarding the rough ride. I have even requested the specifications of the rear shocks and springs because I have a local suspension shop that can change out the springs to a softer load. Unfortunately, Hyundai cant even get me the specifications so that I can spend the money to get a better ride. Does anyone know how I can get this information. I really like the car but cannot deal with the rough ride.

A suspension shop should be able to determine the spring rates. With that information and the vehicle weight over the rear wheels, a suspension shop should be able to take care of you even without the factory specs.
 
I am considering a 4.6 after MB, BMW, Infiniti, etc. Does the Genesis have subframes front and back?
 
The suspension shop is concerned that if they replace the rear shocks and springs in the Genesis, it will affect the ESP system. I spoke with a representative from Hyundai North America and they stated that he thought it would not. Does anyone know for sure if this will be affected? They can send the shocks and springs in to test the spring rate, but it may take a few days. Another item to consider, I've been told, is the tires. I have Dunlop tires on my car and have heard that they are a much rougher ride. Not sure what the cars had that I test drove, but they did not seem as rough.
 
The suspension shop is concerned that if they replace the rear shocks and springs in the Genesis, it will affect the ESP system. I spoke with a representative from Hyundai North America and they stated that he thought it would not. Does anyone know for sure if this will be affected? They can send the shocks and springs in to test the spring rate, but it may take a few days. Another item to consider, I've been told, is the tires. I have Dunlop tires on my car and have heard that they are a much rougher ride. Not sure what the cars had that I test drove, but they did not seem as rough.
Pardon my French, but, that suspension shop is full of something and it is not knowledge of suspensions or ESP systems. That is the biggest crock of crap I have heard. Find a good shop, get your springs and shocks and enjoy the ride. Tires can make a big difference, but, not as much as would be necessary for the type of issue you are hoping to fix. The stock Dunlops are not my favorites but they are also not horrible tires either.
 
Does Hyundai have a good e-mail address to send concerns regarding the suspension to and communicate hope for a change? I tried looking for one online and could only find the corporate phone number which I called and didn't get very far.
 
I had the same problem - it was worse in the back. No one would ride with me in the backseat (in particular) after awhile. My good friend actually got naseous in the back seat going down 355 one afternoon and made me pull over because he almost couldn't keep his lunch down. He said it was the weirdest thing he had ever expereinced in a car. And this is a guy who drives an '02 RAV4 - hardly a cushy ride. Nothing like that had ever happened to me before in any car. Having no one want to ride in back, unfortuantely, kind of defeated the whole purpose of having a huge, lovely back seat and made me even more pissed off about the whole thing.




Let me know if you are able to find out anything for getting a better ride.
I am thinking more and more that the Genesis had to have had some changes some where in the first year. I think those that like the ride are just experiancing a nice firm well balanced ride. Then there are some of us that are getting a teeter totter effect from the front to rear axles (porpoising was another term used).

This effect naturally is amplified tremdously when your talking rough expansion joints or any wash board effects running the full width of the road. Do I hate my 4.6 Genesis? Of course not I am just going to try and do something to get a better ride out of it.

I will say this, while I thought the ride was rough up front, it wasn't until last weekend that I actually rode in the back seat of my car for the first time and found out first hand what my wife, son, elderly parents, and good friends were all complaining about.

It appeared to me that the ride in the rear seat was almost twice as bad as the front seats! I don't know.... it reminded me of riding in the very back of a school bus but not quite that severe.

It was one thing for me to think the car had a rough ride but to have to swallow your pride due to what others say hurts more! My parents are 80 years old and I had taken them on a trip up to a 50th wedding aniversary and were only talking 60 miles one way. They sat in the back seat. There was plenty of complaining going on. I found out once again that the rear cup holders are dangerous unless you have your drinks completely sealed or you get liquid spills all to easily. Strangely enough I haven't had any spills resulting from the front cup holders. This was on a highway where we were being passed by people going 70 mph. The condition of the highway was not bad. It had rougher expansion joints but that isn't all that unusual and I have drove the same road many times in my old 2006 Azera and my current 2006 Elantra with my parents in the back and it was never even brought up as conversation in either of those cars.

I'm suppose to take my parents to Missouri over Memorial Day weekend to decorate some family that is buried there. It will be a 320 mile round trip which we always just do in one day. Dad called me last night and told me that he insists that I take his Buick. He wouldn't say why but I know why because I have always taken my cars when making the trip other years.

We have some close friends that we go out with fairly often. We had always taken turns driving when going out. We took my Genesis right after we got it one night and that was the last time they would let us drive. I remember my friends wife saying shortly after we left "my god this ride is rougher than our GMC Yukon.

So my thing is I haven't been complaining as bad as everyone else and that gets to me. I will say that for being 50 years old it does have the second roughest ride of the 23 or so cars that I have owned. Number one roughest ride was my old 1971 Pontiac GTO that I had jacked up in the back with a lift kit so that I could put wide tires on it. Before I did that it wasn't to bad but afterwards it was a lumber wagon. Back then however the look was cooler than the ride.

I'm just waiting to see if I can get the 2010 suspension update done to mine if there is that update for sure? I just think we should all have an open mind on this. Those that have a Genesis that they think rides good that is great news and they should share it here. If some people are getting something other than what they think is considered normal I think it should be shared here as well. This forum is doing just what it's suppose to. It helps inform other people and you know what if you do have a problem it is nice to be able to discuss it with others right here.

Let's not cut one another down because of different circumstances. After all out of 1000's of cars not every one is going to act the exact same. Hopefully though by going through all the comments on this forum you can find out by percentages on how to look at the Genesis. For the most part it is well liked. For some of us the ride is terrible but rather than go after these people just take it for what it is worth and formulate your own opinion. I still think it's important to get information from all sides.
 
I had the same problem - it was worse in the back. No one would ride with me in the backseat (in particular) after awhile. My good friend actually got naseous in the back seat going down 355 one afternoon and made me pull over because he almost couldn't keep his lunch down. He said it was the weirdest thing he had ever expereinced in a car. And this is a guy who drives an '02 RAV4 - hardly a cushy ride. Nothing like that had ever happened to me before in any car. Having no one want to ride in back, unfortuantely, kind of defeated the whole purpose of having a huge, lovely back seat and made me even more pissed off about the whole thing.

Well in thinking things through I want a smooth ride like right now. I am, however, waiting to see when the 2010 Genesis comes out if it has the rumored suspension improvements. If so I will see if the ride is much better first. If it is I will then see if I can have the updates done to my car whether I have to pay for it or not. If that isn't an option and if I trully like the 2010 Genesis ride compared to mine I am thinking of trading again and maybe also gain the smart cruise control, electronic parking brake, and a possible passneger cooled seat.

And if all that fails I am anxiously awaiting looking at the 2010 Buick Lacrosse. www.buick.com/pages/mds/vehicles/futurelanding.do
Oh I know the Lacrosse only comes in as a mid size and with the largest engine I would loose about a 100 h.p. and about a second and a half to 60 mph.

Also I can't see the stereo system as being close to the Lexicon 17 speaker system in my Genesis. This Buick however finally doesn't look like your grandparents Buick. I think its the best looking Buick to come along in a long time. And it does have some toys that my current Genesis does not, although the future Genesis may. Some nice features worth mentioning are an all new type of blue ambiant lighting throughout the interior. French seam stitched leather appointed seats, although I doubt the quality of my 4.6 leather. Of course it has bluetooth technology, quite tuning to reduce and block outside noise using a lamintated windshield, triple door seals and auto adjusting suspension. It has a cooled driver and passneger seat. A panaromic sun roof is available. Dual rear seat back DVD screens are available. It also has the adaptive headlights.

For safety it also has the parking sensors with rear view camera. It also has blind zone alert radar to warn you when another vehicle is in your outside mirror blind spot. Also it has a headsup display on the windshield such as speedometer, turn signals, cruise control, and audio settings if you so choose to use it. Of course it has Onstar but that isn't a biggie for me. You can get it with AWD although from what I understand you can only get that in the mid level pkg. was the smaller motor. I don't know what that is however that could still turn out to be wrong. Also I am not mentioning all the features.

Now having said that it was GM cars that I had so much trouble with. My last GM owned car was a 1998 Chevy Malibu which had serious engine trouble at 22,000 miles. That is when I tried out Hyundai and have been trouble free since.

Those memories and the fact that this is an all new first year out Buick is not a very comforting feeling. Still the cars style and features are pretty attractive. I think they have set a price of about $36000 for the fully loaded model.

At this point I am just a bit interested in it. My goal though is sticking with the Genesis. The thing I hate though is waiting to see if I can get the updated suspension and even if I can it will be when my car is probably a year old.

No disrespect is meant to anyone when I say my car's suspension isn't at all about one's perception. Those that want to debate a smooth vs. firm ride sure that is opinion. But what I and a few others are trying to describe is well beyond those boundaries (and I am describing the backseat ride mainly).

The reason that I can say this with confidence is not only do I think the ride is terrible but because out of the 20 or so people that have actually rode in our Genesis all of them in one way or another have hated it! Either by telling us directly or finding any reason under the sun not to ride with us when we offer to take our car. I mean its not even like a few like it and the rest hate it........its everyone. I have never in my life owned a vehicle that everyone refuses to ride in after their first ride and we're not talking some old Chevy Vega or something.

If you have this going on there will be absolutely no doubt in your mind about it and it's not even debatable in my mind.
Doug, I think I have some of the same thing that you had going on and you got tired of it way before me. But I only drive my car on weekends and only have 3800 miles on it (bought Nov. 08). Also I hadn't rode in the back seat until last weekend. I still love the car though and I am hoping for a solution for it the sooner the better. I just wanted to speak up and say those that are complaining and then have had someone jump on them and tell them its all about perception couldn't be experiancing what some of us are.

To be fair there doesn't seem to be to many serious complaints which is great for most owners! But I have saw in different reviews of owners who clearly don't have terrible issues like I do as describing the ride as acceptable. Maybe I'm wrong but that would seem to suggest a fair or passable ride. And then under cons you may see need to impove ride.

I will try and end my comments right here because I have already repeated myself to much. I did want to at least mention the 2010 Buick Lacrosse though and see what comments might come up although this forum is for the Genesis I know.
 
Interesting to hear your experiences Duaine. Yes, I had to drive it every day and just could'nt take it anymore and no one wanting to ride with me (or being too embarssed to take anyone along) defeated the whole purposes of a big sedan.

Good luck - time will tell it seems.












QUOTE=Duaine;22520]Well in thinking things through I want a smooth ride like right now. I am, however, waiting to see when the 2010 Genesis comes out if it has the rumored suspension improvements. If so I will see if the ride is much better first. If it is I will then see if I can have the updates done to my car whether I have to pay for it or not. If that isn't an option and if I trully like the 2010 Genesis ride compared to mine I am thinking of trading again and maybe also gain the smart cruise control, electronic parking brake, and a possible passneger cooled seat.

And if all that fails I am anxiously awaiting looking at the 2010 Buick Lacrosse. www.buick.com/pages/mds/vehicles/futurelanding.do
Oh I know the Lacrosse only comes in as a mid size and with the largest engine I would loose about a 100 h.p. and about a second and a half to 60 mph.

Also I can't see the stereo system as being close to the Lexicon 17 speaker system in my Genesis. This Buick however finally doesn't look like your grandparents Buick. I think its the best looking Buick to come along in a long time. And it does have some toys that my current Genesis does not, although the future Genesis may. Some nice features worth mentioning are an all new type of blue ambiant lighting throughout the interior. French seam stitched leather appointed seats, although I doubt the quality of my 4.6 leather. Of course it has bluetooth technology, quite tuning to reduce and block outside noise using a lamintated windshield, triple door seals and auto adjusting suspension. It has a cooled driver and passneger seat. A panaromic sun roof is available. Dual rear seat back DVD screens are available. It also has the adaptive headlights.

For safety it also has the parking sensors with rear view camera. It also has blind zone alert radar to warn you when another vehicle is in your outside mirror blind spot. Also it has a headsup display on the windshield such as speedometer, turn signals, cruise control, and audio settings if you so choose to use it. Of course it has Onstar but that isn't a biggie for me. You can get it with AWD although from what I understand you can only get that in the mid level pkg. was the smaller motor. I don't know what that is however that could still turn out to be wrong. Also I am not mentioning all the features.

Now having said that it was GM cars that I had so much trouble with. My last GM owned car was a 1998 Chevy Malibu which had serious engine trouble at 22,000 miles. That is when I tried out Hyundai and have been trouble free since.

Those memories and the fact that this is an all new first year out Buick is not a very comforting feeling. Still the cars style and features are pretty attractive. I think they have set a price of about $36000 for the fully loaded model.

At this point I am just a bit interested in it. My goal though is sticking with the Genesis. The thing I hate though is waiting to see if I can get the updated suspension and even if I can it will be when my car is probably a year old.

No disrespect is meant to anyone when I say my car's suspension isn't at all about one's perception. Those that want to debate a smooth vs. firm ride sure that is opinion. But what I and a few others are trying to describe is well beyond those boundaries (and I am describing the backseat ride mainly).

The reason that I can say this with confidence is not only do I think the ride is terrible but because out of the 20 or so people that have actually rode in our Genesis all of them in one way or another have hated it! Either by telling us directly or finding any reason under the sun not to ride with us when we offer to take our car. I mean its not even like a few like it and the rest hate it........its everyone. I have never in my life owned a vehicle that everyone refuses to ride in after their first ride and we're not talking some old Chevy Vega or something.

If you have this going on there will be absolutely no doubt in your mind about it and it's not even debatable in my mind.
Doug, I think I have some of the same thing that you had going on and you got tired of it way before me. But I only drive my car on weekends and only have 3800 miles on it (bought Nov. 08). Also I hadn't rode in the back seat until last weekend. I still love the car though and I am hoping for a solution for it the sooner the better. I just wanted to speak up and say those that are complaining and then have had someone jump on them and tell them its all about perception couldn't be experiancing what some of us are.

To be fair there doesn't seem to be to many serious complaints which is great for most owners! But I have saw in different reviews of owners who clearly don't have terrible issues like I do as describing the ride as acceptable. Maybe I'm wrong but that would seem to suggest a fair or passable ride. And then under cons you may see need to impove ride.

I will try and end my comments right here because I have already repeated myself to much. I did want to at least mention the 2010 Buick Lacrosse though and see what comments might come up although this forum is for the Genesis I know.[/QUOTE]
______________________________

Help support this site so it can continue supporting you!
 
I have leased a 2009 Genesis 4.6 with the nav package. I like almost everything about the car except the suspension. I have owned or leased new cars every 2 to 3 years since 1969. My last 3 vehicles (prior to the Genesis) were all totally different high performance sport sedans with V-8 engines (2000 Lincoln LS with sport pkg., 2003 Infiniti M-45, 2006 Infiniti M-45 with sport pkg., which was a totally different car from the 2003). I enjoyed the ride in all of them. I was also in the car business for 15 years and worked at high end luxury dealerships. I have driven just about every high performance sedan out there. I prefer a "firm" suspension, but there is a big difference between a suspension being "firm" and a suspension being "jarring". The Genesis suspension is jarring. I find it incredable that Hyundai could get so much right with this car, but get it so wrong with a major component. Hyundai should offer suspension modifications for the 2009 Genesis to owners who desire a more compliant ride at reasonable cost. I'd be 1st in line. The suspension is not "broken", it just isn't right.
 
Looking to update and upgrade your Genesis luxury sport automobile? Look no further than right here in our own forum store - where orders are shipped immediately!
I have leased a 2009 Genesis 4.6 with the nav package. I like almost everything about the car except the suspension. I have owned or leased new cars every 2 to 3 years since 1969. My last 3 vehicles (prior to the Genesis) were all totally different high performance sport sedans with V-8 engines (2000 Lincoln LS with sport pkg., 2003 Infiniti M-45, 2006 Infiniti M-45 with sport pkg., which was a totally different car from the 2003). I enjoyed the ride in all of them. I was also in the car business for 15 years and worked at high end luxury dealerships. I have driven just about every high performance sedan out there. I prefer a "firm" suspension, but there is a big difference between a suspension being "firm" and a suspension being "jarring". The Genesis suspension is jarring. I find it incredable that Hyundai could get so much right with this car, but get it so wrong with a major component. Hyundai should offer suspension modifications for the 2009 Genesis to owners who desire a more compliant ride at reasonable cost. I'd be 1st in line. The suspension is not "broken", it just isn't right.

I have driven a number of sporty performance sedans. Good handling and good ride quality are not mutually exclusive. I like wverything about my Gen 4.6 except the ride. It is too jittery.
 
Since my wife drives our Genesis daily I only get to take it for gas/oil changes/car wash/trips to restaurants/etc. :D Anyway, I'm trying to get a feel for what's the real culprit with the suspension. I need to get it alone so that I can run some trips over some local bad roads. I'm trying to figure out is the suspension too overly sprung or is the suspension under damped. My best guess, so far, is underdamped. The run seems to have a problem with hitting the bump stops on large dips/dropoffs in pavement plus the rear end acts like it has old worn-out shocks(underdamped) allowing the rear of the car to travel up and down like a yo-yo. That's my perception.

Shocks/struts can be underdamped in one direction and overdamped in the other direction also. That's becuase the internals have two sets of orifices, one for up stroke and the other for down stroke. Better shocks will have progressive openings that can adjust the damping with load or location in the stroke. Plus magnetic adjustable shocks can be programed via computer settings and/or monitoring. Springs can also be linear or progressive and can make all the difference in keeping the suspension from "bottoming" out.

Example - I purchased a Aussie made GTO (2004 - 2006 production) and the factory suspension in that car was equally bad, if not worse, than the problems with the Genesis. Turns out that GM had a run of bad struts that leaked al of the fluid out of the 2006 struts in no time at all. Plus the factory rubber bushings (2004 - 2006) allowed for all kinds of funky suspension movements. Front tires were rubbing against the struts and taking out the tires in no time at all. Alignments won't last for days let alone for many miles. Braking was also a problem due to front suspension fluid filled radius bushings leaking their fluid and allowing the front suspension to move backwards over an inch during braking. Some GTO's were so bad that the front tires hit the inner fender wells! Rear springs sagged within 1000's of miles use and the rear tires wore out on the inner edge. All of this was and still is not reallly addresses by GM. (wonder of all wonders)

But!

But all was addressed by aftermarket companies.

I replaces the four springs and the struts/shocks plus most of the rubber bushings plus also went one step behind street level springs/shocks to the aftermarket "Track II" level with my car since it's a weekend warrior and not a DD car. The wife wasn't happy with that, but she was suprised that the kick in the butt that we both felt with the stock suspension when going over bumps was gone. The new shocks didn't allow hitting the bump stops. Of course this car is now a bit rougher riding than most would like due to the level of spring and dampening that I chose. But in some ways it was smoother riding than stock when hitting bumps. No more spine jarring bump-stop wack to the butt on major expansion joint dropoffs. Just very stiff riding for any bump.

I'd like people to respond:

1) Is the rear of their Genie bouncing up and down giving a yo-yo hop to the rear of the car. Or is the car no bouncing at all and just ridding like the rear end is welded so there's no travel. (IE a wagon with no suspension)

2) Do you feel the car drop to the suspension travel stops when going over a dropoff? Dropping to it's "knees".

3) If yes to #2, then does the suspension rebound up too quickly allowing the front of the car to hop up to the top of suspension travel? Or is it slower in up travel than down travel?

4) Any other detailed observations for what is/is not happening during porpoising problems.

Subjective "rough riding" doesn't help any more than going to a doctor and stating that "I don't feel good" please make me feel better. If anyone is attempting to get aftermarket "stuff" to replace the stock springs, shocks and struts then all of the above will help a good aftermarket shop in suppling the correct hardware.
 
I have voiced this before. I do not believe this is a simple problem like springs being to hard. For most parts the suspension works just fine and its hard to believe it can fail that badly. However, when the suspension is being excited in a very specific way it seems to loose it's ability to dampen the excursions. The range of up and down motion especially in the rear is pretty scary.

The one physical phenomenon that this reminds me of is coupled harmonic oscillators. If you hit these at specific resonance frequencies they shake up instead of providing proper dampening. When you change the excitement frequency slightly the system calms down again. That is exactly what I am seeing by changing the speed.

Since Hyundai cut the air springs as a coist cutting measure for the US model they appeanrently did not spend enought time testing this setup before they brought the car to market here.

Let's just hope this will be fixed in the '10 model and the fix will be offered as a fix for us early adopters.

Cheers

Thomas
 
In response to the 4.6 Titanium Genesis, number 1 applies to my car. I feel like a yo you driving the car, especially on surface streets. Only certain highways allow this car to ride somewhat smoother. Although I have learned to adapt to this ride to an extent, I am searching for the aftermarket company that could correct this problem. The few companies I have talked to are afraid to change suspension, thinking that maybe the car would bottom out with softer suspension. I think Hyundai is really going to have to Step Up and deal with this issue, or they are going to have a very large inventory of these cars sitting around.
 
Let's just hope this will be fixed in the '10 model and the fix will be offered as a fix for us early adopters.

Agreed. I'm specifically waiting to buy a Genesis until the 2010 models solely because of the suspension issue. I just hope Hyundai has been truely listening to the consumers.
 
I would like to add to this discussion.

While I did test drive the vehicle before I made the purchase, I test drove it in PA. I did notice that the ride was a bit nervous, but it wasn't a deal breaker. Last weekend my family and I took a drive to see my parents in NY. After we arrived in Brooklyn, my wife had a headache, and my daughter threw up all over the back seat. The ride on NY roads was atrocious. It was so bad, that my wife hesitated to drive back to PA with our daughter. I own a Subaru Impreza, and the two cars are like day and night. While subaru's suspension is rather firm, it absorbs road imperfections, and the car feels very stable overall. Driving Genesis, felt like we were at the coney island astro park. Every little bump was transmitted into the cabin, and the car was jumping up and down like a yo yo. I got this car to server a purpose of a family sedan, since it was rather cramped for us to drive impreza from NY and back, but as it stands, I can't use it at all. I haven't seen a suspension like that in none of the cars I owned or leased before, dating back to 1991. This is a wonderful car overall, but what use is it, if I can't drive it? So I'm going to wait until 2010, and see if the suspension is any better and if I can retrofit my 2009 model. If not, I will either post the car up on swap lease, or return it to the dealer and pay a penalty. It's a shame. I really wanted to like this car, but suspension made it almost unusable. I knew I should've stuck with subaru. Come September, and I'll might as well get the outback.

This is my personal opinion.
 
A couple of questions:

1. It seems like most of these concerns are coming from 4.6 owners. As a 3.8 owner, the ride over rough road is not as smooth or quiet as I would expect or prefer, but it's not terrible. Just wondering if I'm lucky or if it's something specific to the 4.6?

2. With everyone hoping that Hyundai will do something for early adopters, is there precedent for a manufacturer to offer a service campaign on something so costly that's not safety related? It seems to me that it would be much more likely that they'd make the change on a future model year and current owners would be out of luck.
 
Puredeath - sorry to hear of your ride issue. It all sounds so eerily familiar to my experience. Good luck.


I would like to add to this discussion.

While I did test drive the vehicle before I made the purchase, I test drove it in PA. I did notice that the ride was a bit nervous, but it wasn't a deal breaker. Last weekend my family and I took a drive to see my parents in NY. After we arrived in Brooklyn, my wife had a headache, and my daughter threw up all over the back seat. The ride on NY roads was atrocious. It was so bad, that my wife hesitated to drive back to PA with our daughter. I own a Subaru Impreza, and the two cars are like day and night. While subaru's suspension is rather firm, it absorbs road imperfections, and the car feels very stable overall. Driving Genesis, felt like we were at the coney island astro park. Every little bump was transmitted into the cabin, and the car was jumping up and down like a yo yo. I got this car to server a purpose of a family sedan, since it was rather cramped for us to drive impreza from NY and back, but as it stands, I can't use it at all. I haven't seen a suspension like that in none of the cars I owned or leased before, dating back to 1991. This is a wonderful car overall, but what use is it, if I can't drive it? So I'm going to wait until 2010, and see if the suspension is any better and if I can retrofit my 2009 model. If not, I will either post the car up on swap lease, or return it to the dealer and pay a penalty. It's a shame. I really wanted to like this car, but suspension made it almost unusable. I knew I should've stuck with subaru. Come September, and I'll might as well get the outback.

This is my personal opinion.
 
I would like to add to this discussion.

While I did test drive the vehicle before I made the purchase, I test drove it in PA. I did notice that the ride was a bit nervous, but it wasn't a deal breaker. Last weekend my family and I took a drive to see my parents in NY. After we arrived in Brooklyn, my wife had a headache, and my daughter threw up all over the back seat. The ride on NY roads was atrocious. It was so bad, that my wife hesitated to drive back to PA with our daughter. I own a Subaru Impreza, and the two cars are like day and night. While subaru's suspension is rather firm, it absorbs road imperfections, and the car feels very stable overall. Driving Genesis, felt like we were at the coney island astro park. Every little bump was transmitted into the cabin, and the car was jumping up and down like a yo yo. I got this car to server a purpose of a family sedan, since it was rather cramped for us to drive impreza from NY and back, but as it stands, I can't use it at all. I haven't seen a suspension like that in none of the cars I owned or leased before, dating back to 1991. This is a wonderful car overall, but what use is it, if I can't drive it? So I'm going to wait until 2010, and see if the suspension is any better and if I can retrofit my 2009 model. If not, I will either post the car up on swap lease, or return it to the dealer and pay a penalty. It's a shame. I really wanted to like this car, but suspension made it almost unusable. I knew I should've stuck with subaru. Come September, and I'll might as well get the outback.

This is my personal opinion.

Try testing another vehicle - there's only been one or two others here that have complained about that kind of extreme behavoir.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top