classyobi
Hasn't posted much yet...
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2018
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
- Location
- Dallas Texas
- Genesis Model Type
- No Genesis Yet!
Like the title said, Is their better mpg or overall performance boost with Hp/Torque?
I found that mid-grade actually got better gas mileage than premium on my V6. One can also do a custom blend of a mixture of regular and premium, like 2/3 and 1/3, or whatever. I make sure not to completely fill up the tank when blending the gas, so it sloshes around and mixes up more easily.I tested this over four tanks of gas, and there is no discernible difference between 87 and 93 octane gas, other than a substantially higher price.
Usually it is the retailer who makes the added profit on premium gas. More and more, the oil big oil companies are getting away from owning gas stations. Some pure refiners own their own stations, and also supply gas to other retailers (there are usually only a small number of refineries in any one city).Yes one big benefit, the oil company makes more profit. The 5.0 does have a bit better performance, but that engine was designed to use it.
I have two comments on that:If a car is designed to run on regular gas, using premium gas will only hurt your bank balance.
I run mid-grade. Here, it is 89. 91 is the highest we get here because of altitude purposes. Numerous gas stations even have 85. I don't like putting the minimums in when it comes to my vehicles. For an extra 10-25 cents/gallon, it's worth it for me and it runs better.
I have two comments on that:
1. Hyundai has in the past been known to push the envelope when it comes to gas, fuel mileage ratings, etc. They got in big trouble with the EPA on this a few years back. My guess is that they tune the engines to get maximum fuel mileage and HP, with a compression ratio that leaves very little room for error, and problems may occur when getting gas with maybe a tiny bit less octane than it should have. Also, over time, engines typically need slightly more octane than when new, in order to prevent detonation (pinging).
2. I would agree that premium is too much octane for the V6 to justify the cost. However, on my 1G V6, it does run quieter with better fuel mileage and HP when running mid-grade, or even slightly higher octane than regular (using a custom blend). So if anyone wants to know about whether to use something other than regular, then I would suggest they try it (with midgrade or a custom blend) and see how they like it, instead of just theoretical arguments that may be true for most engines, or older engines, but "may" not be applicable to the Genesis V6. I don't see what the issue is with trying a mid-grade gas for the V6.
First of all, the octane difference between regular and premium is probably to large to justify for an engine designed to run on regular (not talking about the Genesis 5.0 V8 which is designed to run on regular or premium with better performance on premium). That's why I only recommend using mid-grade, or a custom blend (of regular mixed with premium) with even lower octane than mid-grade.Why would an engine need higher octane when it get older? Does the engine compression ratio mysteriously increase when it gets older requiring higher octane gas?
I run regular gas in my Infiniti as my driving style is not aggressive requiring premium gas. Also if the octane requirement are not met the knock sensors keep the engine out of trouble. I did not detect measurable differences in gas mileage between regular and premium gas.
85 octane gasoline is only available in high altitude states and is intended for carbureted engines only. The minimum you can/should run in a fuel injected or turbo engine is 87 octane. All cars today are equipped with knock sensors that constantly adjust timing to reduce knock.
The fluctuation of octane is no good for the motor. Imagine going from 91 to 85. Scary.
Why? Can you please explain this? Once mixed in the tank it would be consistent going to the engine for that tank. Electronics are supposedly compensating. What am I missing"
One tank is not consistency.
There are loads of articles from people specifying why. If I go to the gas station, fill up on 87, run that tank dry, and fill up with 91, this is good. However, if I run my 91 tank dry and fill up with 87, the ecu has to compensate for the lower octane fuel. What I'm getting at is consistency. If you buy a car and put 87 in it, continue to put 87 in it. If you start out with 91, continue with 91. Since cars are not downward compatible, a car requiring 91 octane will run great with 95 or even 98 octane. The same cannot be said with cars requiring 91 and one puts 89 or 87 in..
Are you talking about EPA mileage ratings, or something else?The published ratings of the 3.8L v6 are based on using 93 octane. So, I presume there'd be a slight drop in hp/torque when using fuel with a lower octane.
Are you talking about EPA mileage ratings, or something else?
For 2016, the Hyundai Genesis 3.8L sedan was EPA tested with regular. The 3.8L coupe was tested with premium. The 5.0 sedan was tested with premium.
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymodel/2016_Hyundai_Genesis.shtml
It is interesting that the 3.8L Hyundai Genesis Coupe was tested with premium.
For 2018, the Genesis G80 3.8L sedan was EPA tested with regular. The 3.3L TT and 5,0 were tested with premium.
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymodel/2018_Genesis_G80.shtml