musher51
Been here awhile...
I finally had a moment to read the Motor Trend review, but somewhere 'round page 3 I got distracted by the posted comments.
WOW! Overwhelmingly negative!
Two clear themes prevailed. The first is that the Genesis design is a too-derivative amalgam of the German and Japanese cars it's going after. To many posters, the fact that the design isn't completely new and unique (even overtly risky) is a deal-breaker. Well, I'll concede that Genesis made a deliberate decision to stay conservative and focus on maximizing value (an HMC VP said as much in the video interview), but it's just not that big a deal to me. As long as I find a car pleasant to look at, my aesthetic requirements typically aren't that hard to fulfill. I think there are a LOT of nice looking cars out there.
The other theme is (perhaps not surprisingly) disdain for the Hyundai brand. This entry is classic:
"WOW. You truly did smoke crack before you typed your response didnt you? Saying this new Hyundai is different is like saying Paris Hilton is the smartest female on this planet. Did you not read all the responses above about how generic looking this car is? Theres at least 20!
Also, heres something no one has mentioned. Say you meet some hot girl at a bar or something, what sounds better?
Yeah I drive a BMW, Infiniti, Cadillac, Mercedes? OR...
Yeah I drive a hyundai.
I rest my case."
Yikes. All I can say is, I'm glad I'm not wired that way. True, my last two cars were BMWs, but that's largely because I wanted to experience their vaunted engineering and manufacturing prowess. I lead product development teams for a different high-tech industry, and I respect good technology that's well applied.
But the car I had before that was a '92 Taurus -- and I might still be driving it were it not for the fact that no transmission could last 20K miles. My point is that I'm by no means a classic "car guy".
For me, I feel better about this purchase with every passing day. As I spend more time with the car, I continue to be impressed by the sheer value. I paid $36500 for a V6 Tech Gen in '08 versus $55K for a sport pkg 530 in '02. Not even compensating for future value impact on the '02 purchase, that's about a $20K difference. I really enjoyed all of the 102K miles I put on the Bimmer (much of it at ~90 MPH on mellow interstates late at night) -- and I'll even admit to choking up a bit when I saw it today in the dealer's lot -- but I'm VERY happy with the Genesis nonetheless. Like everyone, I've noted a few quirks and oversights, but no regrets for sure.
So, back to the thread title...it seems to me that Hyundai's biggest remaining challenge for Genesis to be successful is not technical (anymore), but rather emotional/perceptual. And from the tone of the comments in the MT article, the challenge in front of HMC to overcome all that is not insignificant.
WOW! Overwhelmingly negative!
Two clear themes prevailed. The first is that the Genesis design is a too-derivative amalgam of the German and Japanese cars it's going after. To many posters, the fact that the design isn't completely new and unique (even overtly risky) is a deal-breaker. Well, I'll concede that Genesis made a deliberate decision to stay conservative and focus on maximizing value (an HMC VP said as much in the video interview), but it's just not that big a deal to me. As long as I find a car pleasant to look at, my aesthetic requirements typically aren't that hard to fulfill. I think there are a LOT of nice looking cars out there.
The other theme is (perhaps not surprisingly) disdain for the Hyundai brand. This entry is classic:
"WOW. You truly did smoke crack before you typed your response didnt you? Saying this new Hyundai is different is like saying Paris Hilton is the smartest female on this planet. Did you not read all the responses above about how generic looking this car is? Theres at least 20!
Also, heres something no one has mentioned. Say you meet some hot girl at a bar or something, what sounds better?
Yeah I drive a BMW, Infiniti, Cadillac, Mercedes? OR...
Yeah I drive a hyundai.
I rest my case."
Yikes. All I can say is, I'm glad I'm not wired that way. True, my last two cars were BMWs, but that's largely because I wanted to experience their vaunted engineering and manufacturing prowess. I lead product development teams for a different high-tech industry, and I respect good technology that's well applied.
But the car I had before that was a '92 Taurus -- and I might still be driving it were it not for the fact that no transmission could last 20K miles. My point is that I'm by no means a classic "car guy".
For me, I feel better about this purchase with every passing day. As I spend more time with the car, I continue to be impressed by the sheer value. I paid $36500 for a V6 Tech Gen in '08 versus $55K for a sport pkg 530 in '02. Not even compensating for future value impact on the '02 purchase, that's about a $20K difference. I really enjoyed all of the 102K miles I put on the Bimmer (much of it at ~90 MPH on mellow interstates late at night) -- and I'll even admit to choking up a bit when I saw it today in the dealer's lot -- but I'm VERY happy with the Genesis nonetheless. Like everyone, I've noted a few quirks and oversights, but no regrets for sure.
So, back to the thread title...it seems to me that Hyundai's biggest remaining challenge for Genesis to be successful is not technical (anymore), but rather emotional/perceptual. And from the tone of the comments in the MT article, the challenge in front of HMC to overcome all that is not insignificant.