What tires did you replace the OEM with and how would you rate them?

[Jbo]

Replaced my Bridgestone pole position S-04s with a set of OE Conti's, mileage went up 1+ mpg, quieter and better ride.. Me.gatives, not a s crisp handling. 3000 miles on Conti's and I'm rel good with them.

 

[Vince2]

Not as good at handling...Precisely! It appears that you can have crisp handling or great comfort. Looking to tame the firm ride of my 2010 I change the OE Dunlop 5000M's to Michelin MXM4. Sure the ride was smoother but those crisp turns were a thing of the past.

 

[Slider]

I'm digging up this thread after having looked at it a while back.

But now I'm at 28k miles and the Dunlops are TOAST. Time for new rubber.

Appreciate everyone's input herewith, but had a question too, for anyone to answer: are the Conti DWSs more for all-weather, including snow? Being in Houston, I have no worries on that, obviously, but do for rain and heat. I too can be a bit more aggressive driving, so looking for something that wears well, but most of all the noise HAS to be better.

Based on the recos here I'm leaning toward the Bridgestone Serenity Turanza or Pirelli Nero Zero...those seem to have the consensus. Any other input? Thanks!

 

[Crusty Old Shellback]

The Conti DWS is Dry/Wet/Snow. But they also make a DW which I have on my R Spec. They seem to be a better handling tire than the OEM Bridgestone SO4 Pole Positions. Noise is also less. As for milage on them, time will tell. I only got 18K from the SO4.

 

[homeofstone]

I'm digging up this thread after having looked at it a while back.

But now I'm at 28k miles and the Dunlops are TOAST. Time for new rubber.

Appreciate everyone's input herewith, but had a question too, for anyone to answer: are the Conti DWSs more for all-weather, including snow? Being in Houston, I have no worries on that, obviously, but do for rain and heat. I too can be a bit more aggressive driving, so looking for something that wears well, but most of all the noise HAS to be better.

Based on the recos here I'm leaning toward the Bridgestone Serenity Turanza or Pirelli Nero Zero...those seem to have the consensus. Any other input? Thanks!

Check the three surveys below to help.

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/surveyresults/surveydisplay.jsp?type=GTAS

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/surveyresults/surveydisplay.jsp?type=UHPAS

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/surveyresults/surveydisplay.jsp?type=MP

 

[cflmojo]

My Dunlop lasted about 15k miles. There were loud with lots of road noise. I have been purchasing my tires from Tire Rack for years and bought the Kumho tires. Great price, great servic3, and great tires! They made a major difference in ride and dependability.

 

[Crusty Old Shellback]

Homeofstone.

That's an interesting survey in that they rank the SO4 pole positions above the Conti DW. But for me at least on my R Spec, I'd rank them the other way. The DW seems to have better dry traction and also less road noise.

 

[scottdk]

Homeofstone.

That's an interesting survey in that they rank the SO4 pole positions above the Conti DW. But for me at least on my R Spec, I'd rank them the other way. The DW seems to have better dry traction and also less road noise.

I've noticed that the surveys change a lot. The S04's and DW's are always swapping spots, sometimes more than once a week.

 

[CHuntMD]

2011 4.6 w/28k miles w/OEM Conti 5000sp all seasons. Not a good week for nails. one was repairable the other was right where the shoulder and sidewall meet.

After this tread, had 4 Bridgestone Turanza Serenity Plus installed last night. It's the wife's car but I did get to drive upto 65mph for 15 miles to test balance and lane drifting. So far so good. Will hear her comments this evening

CEH

 

[Zerkfitting]

After checking this thread I was going to choose between the Bridgestone Tauranza and Continental DWS. But I have snow tires for winter and I've always wanted to try a summer only tire. I went with the Continental DW. These tires have way more performance than what I need but they are the smoothest and quietest tires I've ever had. They are a summer only tire, we had late snow falls last spring that kept the car in the garage; I tried driving in an inch of slush and could barely move. They will probably need replacement at 25k miles.

______________________________

Help support this site so it can continue supporting you!

 

[shagnat]

Pirelli Zero Nero. I have been very pleased with them.

+1

 

[sterlingblu4.6]

I'm experiencing similar problems with my OEM tires. I purchased the car with 16,000 miles, have driven it for 6,000 and the tires are worn out.

After a long discussion the dealer agreed to cover an alignment and 2 tires if I'd buy the other two. So it looks like the Michelins and Continentals are the best choice.

So here's my question, has anyone replaced the 235's with larger 245 or 255? How wide can you go without needing to purchase larger wheels. What effect does a wider tire have on ride quality.

I'd liek the car to look a little more agressive, any suggestions will be appreciated.

 

[Silver Gen]

I'm experiencing similar problems with my OEM tires. I purchased the car with 16,000 miles, have driven it for 6,000 and the tires are worn out.

After a long discussion the dealer agreed to cover an alignment and 2 tires if I'd buy the other two. So it looks like the Michelins and Continentals are the best choice.

So here's my question, has anyone replaced the 235's with larger 245 or 255? How wide can you go without needing to purchase larger wheels. What effect does a wider tire have on ride quality.

I'd liek the car to look a little more agressive, any suggestions will be appreciated.

I had a 2009 Sonata Limited V6 that I "upgraded" the stock 17" wheels to the exact same size Azera chrome wheels. I was running 245/45 17's (Hankook Ventus V12 evo's; this gave the car a more aggressive look and it also rode and handled better.



For my stock 18" wheels on my Genesis sedan (because I have the premium package), I think 255's would be pushing it. I have a Genesis Coupe Track with 255's in the rear, but the wheel size is 19x8.5 inches. I'm going to be going 255/40 on my sedan, but on 20x8 inch wheels. So you're limited to the width of the tires depending on the width of the OEM wheels. If you're in a bone stock 3.8 Sedan, I think those are 17" wheels, so you'd be able to go with a set up like I had on my Sonata, max width 245.

 

[tmealer]

My Dunlops lasted 35K on my '10 sedan. They still had more tread, but I couldn't stand the noise any longer. I put a set of Nitto Motivos on, and they were excellent in rain and on dry pavement. However, after about 2500 miles, they developed a little vibration and noise. The guys at Discount tire suspected that because my 18" wheels are actually 1/2" narrower than the 235 tires require, they set up some kind of funny wear. Swapped for Continental Pure Contact, and they are OK so far, but drive real loose if the pressure is in the low 30's. I had to get around 36 to get them to handle good. Other than that, they handle and ride good.

 

[shagnat]

The vast majority of folks who change tires seem to love them initially. However, the problems appear to develop after 12-15K of usage.

Just wonder if any tire is as smooth, quiet, etc. in the last half of their life as they are in the first half. hhhmmmmmmm

 

[homeofstone]

The vast majority of folks who change tires seem to love them initially. However, the problems appear to develop after 12-15K of usage.

Just wonder if any tire is as smooth, quiet, etc. in the last half of their life as they are in the first half. hhhmmmmmmm

I have about 40k on my set of Bridgestone Turanza Serenity Plus tires and they are as smooth as when new. Still very quiet too.

 

[Jejuda98]

I finally wore out the crappy Dunlops on my 2010 Genesis. I did a lot of research and finally settled on Continental PureContact w/Eco Plus.

What a difference in noise, ride and handling. The price was good and they have a decent warranty.

I have yet to figure out why Genesis ever put those Dunlops on the car in the first place.

 

[Philth]

I have yet to figure out why Genesis ever put those Dunlops on the car in the first place.

I'm fairly sure to state that reducing cost was their main concern. Goes with most business practices. Lowest bidder/cost that meets the requirement wins.

 

[Vince2]

The Dunlops are an ultra high performance tire. The nature of high performance tires combined with a firm suspension make for a ride that is too unforgiving for many of us here. I also changed out the OE Dunlops for a softer grand touring tire. The Genesis was quieter and rode smoother BUT that means less crisp turning and stopping. It seems you can be either sporty or comfortable...not both. Check the price of the Dunlops. They aren't cheap.

 

[shagnat]

I'm fairly sure to state that reducing cost was their main concern. Goes with most business practices. Lowest bidder/cost that meets the requirement wins.

Price is not the first consideration. It's a quite involved process as to how OE tires are chosen. It's not easy to "earn" the manufacturer's selection for their cars.