Oh my... So much to unpack here.
I find it amusing that so much of the content in this sub-forum is anti-EV and largely generated by the same two folks. There are Genesis EV sub-forums here, where one could read and get an understanding of actual owner experiences.
“A surge of stranded electric vehicles, predominantly Tesla cars, has overtaken the Oak Brook Supercharger station in Chicago, as a severe cold snap renders many EVs powerless and immobile.”
A surge of stranded electric vehicles, predominantly Tesla cars, has overtaken the Oak Brook Supercharger station in Chicago, as a severe cold snap renders many EVs powerless and immobile.
www.breitbart.com
Yup. Road-trip charging is the Achilles heel of EVs. It's plain awful. A ridiculously high percentage of chargers is down at any given moment, and those that run seem to rarely deliver the charge speeds they should.
I get it. You don't like EVs. So stick to your dinosaur remains powered vehicle and leave us alone!
Actually, oil DOESN'T come from dinosaurs. There you go, at least one thing that folks will learn from this post.
I find it a bit amusing to see how the EV world can't hold up to weather issues like this and power outages etc.
How close are you to a gas station that works without electricity? I'm not aware of any gasoline-powered pumps.
So anyone who reports about this mess that actually happened is biased?
No, but you certainly are. Every EV-related post I've seen from you squarely falls on one side.
This Earth we live on is 4.5 billion years old and chugging along just fine. The whole "climate change" (world is ending soon!) all because of mankind is a total farce IMO. Every year for decades someone says "world will freeze over in 10 years!" or "World is going to melt!" and none of it rings true. It's all just a money grab for a certain sect of folks who love to fear monger.
This is absolute nonsense. The existence of anthropogenic climate change is undeniable. Sure, let's talk about what we should be doing about it, and how significant an impact driving EVs will be. But denying the problem given the overwhelming evidence is ridiculous.
Until I can charge a car to full in under 10 minutes like I can with a "dino car", and until I can find a "filling" station on every corner of every town like I can with my "dino car", when I don't have to invest $2k+ to put a decent charger in my garage, and until it doesn't cost 5 figures to replace a battery in an EV when it dies at potentially less than 100K miles, I'll stick with my "dino car" and enjoy every minute of stress free filling up and driving.
The $2K charger and eventual battery replacement cost arguments are red-herrings. Expensive chargers are not needed, nor is a pack replacement likely for anything being purchased these days.
I've done some math, and calculated that the average driver will spend ~three hours a year pumping gas. I suspect I've spent about 10% of that each year charging my car. Most charging is done at home, taking just a few seconds of driver time to plug in. If refueling time is so critically important to you, you should already be driving an EV.
Possibly, but doubt it will be in our lifetime.
Also, what kind of eco pollution will all these dead batteries cause down the road. Mother Earth will not appreciate that.
This may be another very valid criticism. It's been a couple years since I've seen details on this, but the situation as I was last aware of it was that recyclers have started to collect and retain old batteries in anticipation of recycling at scale, but that there wasn't anything significant being done at the moment.
I would expect that as EVs become more predominant, material costs will rise, driving increasing financial incentive for recycling of lithium batteries. There are existing means of disposing of & containing hazardous materials that can be readily employed for batteries, so that their components don't leach into the environment, so I think this is more about circularity/efficiency than harm at time of disposal