• Car enthusiast? Join us on Cars Connected! iOS | Android | Desktop
  • Hint: Use a descriptive title for your new message
    If you're looking for help and want to draw people in who can assist you, use a descriptive subject title when posting your message. In other words, "I need help with my car" could be about anything and can easily be overlooked by people who can help. However, "I need help with my transmission" will draw interest from people who can help with a transmission specific issue. Be as descriptive as you can. Please also post in the appropriate forum. The "Lounge" is for introducing yourself. If you need help with your G70, please post in the G70 section - and so on... This message can be closed by clicking the X in the top right corner.

Electrify America Sucks

I think it is a great idea in general. Nobody should be charging to 100% at a DC fast charger. They aren't designed for that. The charge rate inevitably slows down to a fraction of the peak charge and the last 10-20% can take twice as long as the first 80-90 percent.

I love that EA is doing this and I hope they expand the pilot to their entire network.

I say this having been stuck waiting behind someone trying to charge to 100% and taking up a charger while there are a line of cars waiting far too often.
I am new to this, but am sometimes doing 90%. I can see that this is unpopular. Last night I did it multiple empty charges alongside. I charged from 29% to 90% in 21 minutes. I don't feel like I was hoarding and am certain I wasn't delaying anyone. I guess my point is, it is situational.
 
I think it is a great idea in general. Nobody should be charging to 100% at a DC fast charger. They aren't designed for that. The charge rate inevitably slows down to a fraction of the peak charge and the last 10-20% can take twice as long as the first 80-90 percent.

I love that EA is doing this and I hope they expand the pilot to their entire network.

I say this having been stuck waiting behind someone trying to charge to 100% and taking up a charger while there are a line of cars waiting far too often.
I agree, and disagree. When I'm on a trip, and am charging at a very rural station with no one waiting, I should have the ability to charge to 100%. If I wish to spend the time waiting, and no one is inconvenienced but me, that should be my choice.
City chargers that are busy... should limit charging.
The caveat to that of course, are those who plug in and leave. I have waited for people to return to their cars long after charging has stopped. Limiting their SOC will not prevent that from happening.
 
I am new to this, but am sometimes doing 90%. I can see that this is unpopular. Last night I did it multiple empty charges alongside. I charged from 29% to 90% in 21 minutes. I don't feel like I was hoarding and am certain I wasn't delaying anyone. I guess my point is, it is situational.

90% is actually OK in my personal book, it is going to 100% that I am not cool with. I guarantee you if you stayed and charged to 100% you would have spent significantly longer getting to 100% than your entire 21 minute charge from 21 to 90. The charge rate drops significantly because the battery temperature rises dramatically as it charges at a much higher rate between 21 and 80-90 and the system throttles the charging speed down to protect the battery. I have seen it go down to as low as 18 kWh. At that speed you are taking up a charger that someone else could be using at a much higher speed and making them wait unnecessarily wasting their time.

That said, if you are at a station and there is no line, and plenty of charger availability - then it is another story. The moment all chargers are being used and someone shows up and is now waiting for you to finish charging to 100% is where I have a major problem. That someone is probably me. :cool:
 
I agree, and disagree. When I'm on a trip, and am charging at a very rural station with no one waiting, I should have the ability to charge to 100%. If I wish to spend the time waiting, and no one is inconvenienced but me, that should be my choice.
City chargers that are busy... should limit charging.
The caveat to that of course, are those who plug in and leave. I have waited for people to return to their cars long after charging has stopped. Limiting their SOC will not prevent that from happening.

I hear you. If you are somewhere and there is plenty of availability and nobody waiting - do your thing. My issue is when I show up and all chargers are in use and I'm waiting for someone to charge to 100%. It happens to me more than 50% of the time I have DC fast charged and it is very aggravating because it is a complete waste of my time.

A lot of is is simply a lack of education on people's part where they don't appreciate that the last 10-15% is going to take significantly longer and potentially make me wait unnecessarily. A lot of it is entitlement that someone waited their turn and now they are going to take as much time as they want at that charger because they don't give one care how much they inconvenience anyone else.

This is the challenge with having a complicated process for "refueling" an electric vehicle where a lot of the education and etiquette isn't established at the time of sale (or posted at charging stations) vs. a process that is over 100 years old at gas stations where everyone knows what to do and the time it takes to refill the tanks of even very different size vehicles is trivial.
 
Last edited:
I hope they expand the pilot to their entire network.
I don't agree that it should be expanded to the entire network - just metropolitan areas. There are places in the intermountain West where chargers are over 150 miles apart. In that case I think it should be allowed to go over 85%, and it appears that EA agrees. I think the 85% limit should only be applied when there are multiple other EA stations within 50 miles. So Los Angeles, Las Vegas, San Francisco etc. But there should not be a limit at places like Gallup, NM or Prescott, AZ.

The caveat to that of course, are those who plug in and leave. I have waited for people to return to their cars long after charging has stopped. Limiting their SOC will not prevent that from happening.
It won't prevent it, but EA will charge them idle fees. If those are high enough, that should discourage it.
 
I don't agree that it should be expanded to the entire network - just metropolitan areas. There are places in the intermountain West where chargers are over 150 miles apart. In that case I think it should be allowed to go over 85%, and it appears that EA agrees. I think the 85% limit should only be applied when there are multiple other EA stations within 50 miles. So Los Angeles, Las Vegas, San Francisco etc. But there should not be a limit at places like Gallup, NM or Prescott, AZ.


It won't prevent it, but EA will charge them idle fees. If those are high enough, that should discourage it.
I read a recent article that EA "will" start to charge people idle fees. I could be wrong but I think the majority of people charging at EA are under the "Free" charging program. I think once EA starts to charge idle fees a lot of people will more their cars. Some people don't care about others waiting, unless there are repercussions that would cost themselves money.
 
I read a recent article that EA "will" start to charge people idle fees. I could be wrong but I think the majority of people charging at EA are under the "Free" charging program. I think once EA starts to charge idle fees a lot of people will more their cars.
They don't charge idle fees now? Whenever my charge finishes the EA app always tells me to disconnect within 10 minutes to avoid idle fees, and it even counts down the time (I've never gotten below 7-8 minutes, even that was only because I was chatting to the next driver). I think the timer also shows on the stall itself. Are you saying they are lying to me? (not that I would be super surprised)
 
I
They don't charge idle fees now? Whenever my charge finishes the EA app always tells me to disconnect within 10 minutes to avoid idle fees, and it even counts down the time (I've never gotten below 7-8 minutes, even that was only because I was chatting to the next driver). I think the timer also shows on the stall itself. Are you saying they are lying to me? (not that I would be super surprised)
I have had the car for two years now. On my very first charge experience two years ago they had the same warning to disconnect within 10 minutes or else. I Have never encountered anyone in my area that had said they were ever charged an idle fee for exceeding the 10 minute grace period.
 
According to State Of Charge With Tom Moloughney, EA started charging idle fees on August 17, 2023.


Though according to this guy, they didn't do it on that day.


This EA Instagram post from May 2024 says they do have idle fees.


The EA web site definitely says they charge idle fees, it says this in multiple places. It's supposed to be $0.40 per hour.

I couldn't find anybody online that said that they had been charged idle fees in the past year. But I didn't find anyone that said they weren't charged them either. Of course the sort of people that leave their car plugged in idle at a DCFC probably aren't the sort of people that are active on EV forums and social media.
 
I don't agree that it should be expanded to the entire network - just metropolitan areas. There are places in the intermountain West where chargers are over 150 miles apart. In that case I think it should be allowed to go over 85%, and it appears that EA agrees. I think the 85% limit should only be applied when there are multiple other EA stations within 50 miles. So Los Angeles, Las Vegas, San Francisco etc. But there should not be a limit at places like Gallup, NM or Prescott, AZ.


It won't prevent it, but EA will charge them idle fees. If those are high enough, that should discourage it.

I don't think it should be based on geographic area but rather usage in real time. If chargers are full then nobody should be allowed to charge to past 85%.
______________________________

Help support this site so it can continue supporting you!
 
Maybe a good use of AI??? Monitoring status of chargers to see if they are all working and controlling charging limits if they appear busy. Much better use of AI than generating deep fake political ads.
 
I agree, and disagree. When I'm on a trip, and am charging at a very rural station with no one waiting, I should have the ability to charge to 100%. If I wish to spend the time waiting, and no one is inconvenienced but me, that should be my choice.
This just happened to me at a Tesla Magic Dock with 8 chargers at 11:00 Saturday night. I was the only one using that facility at that time so there were 7 empty spots next to me. ABRP said I needed to charge to 93% to get home. This Magic Dock location throttled down from 97 kW to 7 kW at 81%. It basically forced me to spend another hour or more charging at that location or find an extra stop along my route (which is what I ended up doing). It was very inconvenient.

To make matters worse, I was with an EV skeptic and hoping we would have a hiccup-free trip. Bummer.
 
This just happened to me at a Tesla Magic Dock with 8 chargers at 11:00 Saturday night. I was the only one using that facility at that time so there were 7 empty spots next to me. ABRP said I needed to charge to 93% to get home. This Magic Dock location throttled down from 97 kW to 7 kW at 81%. It basically forced me to spend another hour or more charging at that location or find an extra stop along my route (which is what I ended up doing). It was very inconvenient.

To make matters worse, I was with an EV skeptic and hoping we would have a hiccup-free trip. Bummer.
If one is going to drive an EV on long trips, IMO one has to plan on stopping more often by charging to 80%. The time on the trip will actually be shorter and you won't be spending your time watching paint dry. Eventually, as state and local governments start building up the fast charger infrastructure, that will be relatively easy. But we probably have a few years before that happens. We didn't get all our gas stations overnight and we won't get all the charging stations overnight either.
 
I was shocked this weekend to see an new EA station across the street from another EA station that just got upgraded. One has six stations the other fourteen. These are not in a major city and on the edge of rural Sacramento (Rocklin/Loomis). This new one was not announced and the three that were announced a year ago for this area are not online.
 
I was shocked this weekend to see an new EA station across the street from another EA station that just got upgraded. One has six stations the other fourteen. These are not in a major city and on the edge of rural Sacramento (Rocklin/Loomis). This new one was not announced and the three that were announced a year ago for this area are not online.
You folks in that area are really getting treated very well. From the new Genesis dealer/service center to this. Good on you!
 
If one is going to drive an EV on long trips, IMO one has to plan on stopping more often by charging to 80%. The time on the trip will actually be shorter and you won't be spending your time watching paint dry. Eventually, as state and local governments start building up the fast charger infrastructure, that will be relatively easy. But we probably have a few years before that happens. We didn't get all our gas stations overnight and we won't get all the charging stations overnight either.
Yep, I agree with you. In this specific instance, however, the alternative charging locations were off my route. I had to drive out of my way to get to them, which I'm sure is why ABRP suggested charging at the Magic Dock up to 93%.

Speaking of which, in addition to upgrading the infrastructure, ABRP probably needs to be aware you aren't allowed to charge above 80% at these locations so it can effectively plan routes. There were also no mentions of the 80% limitation on PlugShare (there is now, though!).
 
This Magic Dock location throttled down from 97 kW to 7 kW at 81%.
It's typical that the GV60 throttles down to a very low number at around 82-83%. Then it usually goes back up again.

I've charged twice at Magic Dock locations, once to 90% and once to 86%. I only went over 80% to see what would happen. I did not see a drop to 7kw, but it did gradually drop to about 50kw.

I did one time see a drop to 7kw at an EA station at 82%, but then it jumped back up to 75kw or so after a minute.

Anyway, I don't think Tesla has any policy of intentional throttling above 80%. Why would they do that? - it would just tie up the charger longer! I think what happened to you was simply the car requesting lower power, perhaps to manage the battery temperature.
 
Looking to update and upgrade your Genesis luxury sport automobile? Look no further than right here in our own forum store - where orders are shipped immediately!
This Magic Dock location throttled down from 97 kW to 7 kW at 81%.
I only charge at EA. A few months ago around the time of the recall being applied for overheating charge ports mine starting doing this this most of the time. Not sure why because a couple minutes later is goes up to ~70kW. Before the recall fix during a very hot summer day when I was charging at EA I heard a loud bang, the car and app had an electrical failure type message. Which went away after a couple ignition cycles. Last week at a newly upgrade EA station it just stopped charging out of know where at 50%. I had to leave in ten minutes so I decided not to try and restart a session.
 
Clearly there are a lot of variables. But, recently I have seen several "150kW" EA chargers deliver 174kW and then two stops at a 350kW EA charger that never exceeded 150kW. All of these are at 55-75 degrees ambient temp. For one of the visits to the 350kW charger, I nav'd to the charger and confirmed that it showed the battery pre-conditioning indicator on the way there.
 
recently I have seen several "150kW" EA chargers deliver 174kW
These chargers are really 175kW chargers, but EA brands them as 150. I think they think that "175" is too complicated for folks. Note that 175 is 1/2 of 350. I think a 350 charger is basically two 150s (actually 175s) connected together internally.

then two stops at a 350kW EA charger that never exceeded 150kW
What was your SOC when you started charging? Also, 55 degrees is definitely cold enough to reduce charging speeds. How long were you pre-conditioning?

The best I've gotten is 238 kW. But once the SOC gets up to about 50% it drops to around 150-175, even at a 350 charger. Actually that's the best I've heard of anyone getting with an EGMP vehicle. I've heard that Porcshe Taycan and Cybertrucks can actually pull the full 350 (for a few minutes, at least).
 
Back
Top