• Car enthusiast? Join us on Cars Connected! iOS | Android | Desktop
  • Hint: Use a descriptive title for your new message
    If you're looking for help and want to draw people in who can assist you, use a descriptive subject title when posting your message. In other words, "I need help with my car" could be about anything and can easily be overlooked by people who can help. However, "I need help with my transmission" will draw interest from people who can help with a transmission specific issue. Be as descriptive as you can. Please also post in the appropriate forum. The "Lounge" is for introducing yourself. If you need help with your G70, please post in the G70 section - and so on... This message can be closed by clicking the X in the top right corner.

Lemon Law Experiences in California?

okunney

Hasn't posted much yet...
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Hi all:

So it's looking more and more like my 2012 Genny 3.8 is a lemon. Does anyone have lemon law stories?

For example, what is the best angle to attack this?

Has anyone emailed the CEO, or some other top executive?

Has anyone gotten free upgrades?

Please let me know!
 
I recently went thur the Lemon Law in Cali with my Pontiac G8. It all depends on what is exactly wrong with the car as to weather or not you can get anything done.

Here's a link to the guy I used. Give them a call and tell them your story. They will let you know your best course of action.

http://www.californialemonlawattorney.com/

Good luck.
 
Hi all:

So it's looking more and more like my 2012 Genny 3.8 is a lemon. Does anyone have lemon law stories?

For example, what is the best angle to attack this?

Has anyone emailed the CEO, or some other top executive?

Has anyone gotten free upgrades?

Please let me know!

this should save you some research:
The California "Lemon Law"

The California Lemon Law (officially known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty act, found in California Civil Code sections 1790 et seq.) is a law designed to protect consumers who purchase or lease warranted motor vehicles. If it is determined that a motor vehicle is a "lemon," the motor vehicle's warrantor must repurchase or replace the motor vehicle from the buyer.

In order to have a valid Lemon Law claim, the following elements must be met:

1.) The vehicle must be used some of the time for personal, family or household purposes. If a vehicle is used exclusively for business purposes, the Lemon Law will not apply, but other laws may provide certain remedies.

2.) The vehicle must have problems covered by a warranty. There is a simple rule: no warranty means no Lemon Law case.

3.) The warrantor must be unable to repair the vehicle's warranty problems after a reasonable number or repair attempts. What constitutes a reasonable number of repair attempts will vary depending on the problem. For example, if a vehicle's brakes fail, one repair attempt may be enough to establish a reasonable number. Generally, safety-related or drivability concerns will require fewer repair attempts than those which are not safety-related or affect drivability.

Also relevant to determining whether there has been a reasonable number of repair attempts is the number of days the vehicle is out-of-service due to warranty repairs. The more days out-of-service, the better the chance of establishing a reasonable number of repair attempts.

There is a common misconception concerning the Lemon Law, that it only applies to vehicles that are less than 18 months old or have less than 18,000 miles. This belief is not true! The Lemon Law will apply to a vehicle regardless of how old it is or how many miles is has, so long as the vehicle is having problems that are under warranty.

Even if the warranty has expired, the Lemon Law may apply. If the vehicle is still having problems that were complained about and never properly repaired during the warranty period, a valid Lemon Law claim may exist.

4.) The vehicle must contain a problem covered by the warranty that substantially impairs the vehicle's use, value or safety to a reasonable person in the position as the Buyer. The Lemon Law, generally, will not apply to vehicles with trivial or minor defects. Nevertheless, each case must be judged independently taking into account the particular needs and expectations of the particular vehicle's owner/lessee.

If the above mentioned elements are met, the vehicle is a lemon. The vehicle's owner/lessee will be entitled to a replacement vehicle or a refund of the vehicle's purchase/lease price.

Vehicle Warranties: California has very specific rules on what defines a warranty. A factory warranty is something that is given to the consumer at the time of sale. The warranty can be a “new car warranty”, a “used car warranty”, or a “certified pre-owned” warranty. What all of these warranties is that they are provided and administered by the automobile manufacturer.

The next category of vehicle warranties are “dealer warranties”. These “warranties” have no connection or affiliation with the “factory warranty”, and are between the BUYER and the SELLING DEALER. The manufacturer has no liability for the selling dealer internal warranties.

The final category of vehicle warranties are “extended warranties”. These “warranties” are valid in many other states, but NOT in California. California has its own rules that govern these “warranties”. In fact, these are not warranties at all. In California, these must be called “mechanical breakdown policies”, “service contracts” or other titles that do NOT use the word “warranty”, as you cannot purchase a warranty in California on a motor vehicle. Many automobile dealerships mislead consumers by calling these contracts “warranties”, but they are not, and have no applicability to California Lemon Law. So, it does not matter what a dealer calls it – if the word “warranty” is not on the face of the application form, then it is NOT a warranty.

Consumer rights in the California Lemon Law: All consumers have the same rights under our California lemon law, whether the vehicle was purchased or leased, is new or used, as long as it’s covered by a warranty. Consumers should realize that automobile manufacturers, though they will often make gestures of goodwill in an attempt to bolster customer loyalty, are at heart still businesses. They are there to make money – not give it back. Though automobile manufacturer’s should buy back offending vehicles that meet lemon law state statute guidelines automatically by reviewing the dealer-submitted warranty repair claims, most of the time they do not. In most all cases, application of the California lemon law is a consumer-driven event. Consumers will hire lemon law attorneys to ensure that the manufacturer conforms to their legal duties.
 
Thanks, guys.

I'm aware of the lemon law requirements, but I want to resolve it without an attorney and free up what would have gone to attorney's fees to an upgrade of my vehicle.

Think that's a possibility? Trying to get some information as to that angle. But if you guys have scored upgrades using an attorney, by all means, let me know!
 
Here is what my deal was with the attorney I posted.

GM paid full price of what I had paid on my loan for the car including the intrest. They deducted for the milage I drove up until it became a lemon. The lawyer got 10% of the money I actually got back.

They did not pay me for any of the extras I got like extended warrenty or GAP insurance. I went to the dealer and cancled those and got a prorated refund directly to me.

GM paid the lawyers fees directly to him. GM also paid off what I owed on the loan.

I didn't have to hassle with anyone and it took less than 3 months to settle. Once the negoation was done, lawyer sent me a letter, I drove the car back to the dealer, signed some papers and left. No hassle at all. Got a check in the mail a week later.

Not sure what you are looking for when you say upgrades. If you go lemon law, you will not own the car anymore, it goes back to the dealer and they can only sell it with a lemon law byback title.

Simple and easy. I didn't have to hassle with GM at all. Was worth it in the end.

From what bradyb posted.
My car was 3 years old with 45K miles on it when I turned it in. It was still under warrenty.
#4 is the biggie catch all. Just because the radio dosen't work does not constitute a lemon law. Convience items suchs as that don't seem to count. Only safety items. If you have an issue that can be related to a mod you made that may have caused the issues, then no lemon law. I ran into a few of these in my case. But when the motor had problems and the seat belt broke, I was a lemon.
 
I just finished fighting a lemon case here in Orange County, CA with a certified used Mazda CX9. Navigating this without help is going to be not only frustrating but a complete overtaking of your life and free time.

What I ended up doing was talking to a Lemon Attorney. It was a pretty painless process by just calling the number. They were very nice and explained the whole process. I was asked a series of questions which determine if you have a case or not. Mine was about 15 mins or so of various questions. Its been just over 6 months since my attorney starting fighting the dealer and he won the case for me. I got more money back then what I paid originally, so when I receive payment in the next few weeks, I am getting a Stinger GT.

It's worth looking into talking to one of these lemon lawyers. The one I used was California Lemon Lawyers based out of OC. They have offices all around California and deal with this stuff all of the time. Give them a call, I am sure they will let you know in a few minutes if you have a case or not.

Goodluck man
 
Looking to update and upgrade your Genesis luxury sport automobile? Look no further than right here in our own forum store - where orders are shipped immediately!
I’ve done 2 without an attorney, in both of my cases I far exceeded the requirements and took it to arbitration, the arbitrator found for me in both cases and GM paid me back MSRP plus all interest, out of pocket expenses that included tires, oil changes, and registration fees.

As stated it all depends on what is wrong with the vehicle, how long the dealer has it trying to repair it etc.
 
I’ve done 2 without an attorney, in both of my cases I far exceeded the requirements and took it to arbitration, the arbitrator found for me in both cases and GM paid me back MSRP plus all interest, out of pocket expenses that included tires, oil changes, and registration fees.

As stated it all depends on what is wrong with the vehicle, how long the dealer has it trying to repair it etc.

I did the ARB board with Ford back in 2004, was pretty smooth because the car was only 10 months old. It was a 2004 Focus SVT that had stuttering mid rpm and they couldn't fix it to save their life. The ECU had so many reflashes, it could no longer be flashed and they bricked it. The Mazda was the dealer not wanting to fix their mistake, so the attorney was the only avenue. Glad it worked out for you. You never know what their decision is going to be at those ARBs.
 
Back
Top