• Car enthusiast? Join us on Cars Connected! iOS | Android | Desktop
  • Hint: Use a descriptive title for your new message
    If you're looking for help and want to draw people in who can assist you, use a descriptive subject title when posting your message. In other words, "I need help with my car" could be about anything and can easily be overlooked by people who can help. However, "I need help with my transmission" will draw interest from people who can help with a transmission specific issue. Be as descriptive as you can. Please also post in the appropriate forum. The "Lounge" is for introducing yourself. If you need help with your G70, please post in the G70 section - and so on... This message can be closed by clicking the X in the top right corner.

3.3T Ecu tune

Let us know how things go with Pressertech. Interested to hear your perspective on that vs the JB4.

Still gonna wait a little bit longer. I want to see what Kagan does with his tune, if he's really able to flash over CANBus. Also I'll least wait until I get my new intercooler, which still is a month or two away it seems.

I'm not so worried about max power anymore, more about reliability. Even so, the few people that have PRESSERTech seem to love it.
 
Still gonna wait a little bit longer. I want to see what Kagan does with his tune, if he's really able to flash over CANBus. Also I'll least wait until I get my new intercooler, which still is a month or two away it seems.

I'm not so worried about max power anymore, more about reliability. Even so, the few people that have PRESSERTech seem to love it.

gotcha. Do you have any reason to think those tunes would be any more reliable than a JB4? If so why/how? Also, wouldn’t the tune invalidate any engine/drivetrain related warranty repairs?
 
Im assuming you will continue using the jb4 on map 0 for logging right? then maybe map 6 to dial in very small amounts of boost after that?
 
Yeah, I'd keep the JB4 for a while just to see what's going on, but I don't know if I'd tinker much with it, as I'm beginning to trust it less and less. Ever since I first got it i have noticed inconsistent shift speeds when at WOT. Sometimes it will shift at redline and release the bypass valves just for a split second, other times it keeps the boost charged while shifting without releasing anything, resulting in slightly quicker shifts. I really think the JB4's load manipulation is to blame. Also, Terry tells me that changing AFR's only affects AFR's, but I think it's more complicated than that. I think there are other factors besides fuel injector duty when it comes to the ECU reading AFR's.

As for increasing boost with a tune, any sort of boost manipulation would mess up the ignition timing, potentially causing a dangerous scenario that would be magnified by the increased values from the new tune. Perhaps if I was messing around with really high octane fuel, but I'm only going to use pump gas on my car so I have no interest in that. Others that use the JB4 with a flash tune have verified this, and considering the JB4 has no safety for high ignition advance or knock detection (it's all up to the ECU to deal with those things) I think it becomes a safety hazard when running relatively high boost levels and pump gas; hence the recommendations for crazy high octane when going above Map 2, and that's when virtually everything else is stock.
 
so all the ecu flashes so far are more for a 91-93 octane set up? and they are achieving roughly the same boost as the jb4 on a lower octane rating?
 
Yeah, I'd keep the JB4 for a while just to see what's going on, but I don't know if I'd tinker much with it, as I'm beginning to trust it less and less. Ever since I first got it i have noticed inconsistent shift speeds when at WOT. Sometimes it will shift at redline and release the bypass valves just for a split second, other times it keeps the boost charged while shifting without releasing anything, resulting in slightly quicker shifts. I really think the JB4's load manipulation is to blame. Also, Terry tells me that changing AFR's only affects AFR's, but I think it's more complicated than that. I think there are other factors besides fuel injector duty when it comes to the ECU reading AFR's.

As for increasing boost with a tune, any sort of boost manipulation would mess up the ignition timing, potentially causing a dangerous scenario that would be magnified by the increased values from the new tune. Perhaps if I was messing around with really high octane fuel, but I'm only going to use pump gas on my car so I have no interest in that. Others that use the JB4 with a flash tune have verified this, and considering the JB4 has no safety for high ignition advance or knock detection (it's all up to the ECU to deal with those things) I think it becomes a safety hazard when running relatively high boost levels and pump gas; hence the recommendations for crazy high octane when going above Map 2, and that's when virtually everything else is stock.

I can understand that. I would totally get a tune if I knew I wouldn’t have warranty concerns. I really also want something that can improve the shifts and launch. Does anyone know if dealerships can detect if you swapped back to a stock flash after running a tuned ECU flash?
 
I can understand that. I would totally get a tune if I knew I wouldn’t have warranty concerns. I really also want something that can improve the shifts and launch. Does anyone know if dealerships can detect if you swapped back to a stock flash after running a tuned ECU flash?
From what I know all they can see is that it’s been flashed, and how many times it’s been flashed. So yes they can see its been altered.
 
I can understand that. I would totally get a tune if I knew I wouldn’t have warranty concerns. I really also want something that can improve the shifts and launch. Does anyone know if dealerships can detect if you swapped back to a stock flash after running a tuned ECU flash?
i believe they can tell how many times its been flashed but not what the flashes contained except the current map. thats why tork offers a completely duplicate ecu(second ecu) that has the performance tune adn give you back the stock ecu with no modifications to it
 
From what I know all they can see is that it’s been flashed, and how many times it’s been flashed. So yes they can see its been altered.
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I am thinking more along the lines of getting a replacement ECU flashed with the tune. And swapping back to the stock ECU if service was required.
 
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I am thinking more along the lines of getting a replacement ECU flashed with the tune. And swapping back to the stock ECU if service was required.
so they cant tell that your oem file has been duplicated. but ive read there will be data missing. like logs and mileage and that the ecu is recording
______________________________

Help support this site so it can continue supporting you!
 
Yeah, I'd keep the JB4 for a while just to see what's going on, but I don't know if I'd tinker much with it, as I'm beginning to trust it less and less. Ever since I first got it i have noticed inconsistent shift speeds when at WOT. Sometimes it will shift at redline and release the bypass valves just for a split second, other times it keeps the boost charged while shifting without releasing anything, resulting in slightly quicker shifts. I really think the JB4's load manipulation is to blame. Also, Terry tells me that changing AFR's only affects AFR's, but I think it's more complicated than that. I think there are other factors besides fuel injector duty when it comes to the ECU reading AFR's.

As for increasing boost with a tune, any sort of boost manipulation would mess up the ignition timing, potentially causing a dangerous scenario that would be magnified by the increased values from the new tune. Perhaps if I was messing around with really high octane fuel, but I'm only going to use pump gas on my car so I have no interest in that. Others that use the JB4 with a flash tune have verified this, and considering the JB4 has no safety for high ignition advance or knock detection (it's all up to the ECU to deal with those things) I think it becomes a safety hazard when running relatively high boost levels and pump gas; hence the recommendations for crazy high octane when going above Map 2, and that's when virtually everything else is stock.
Crushing my dreams Todd. Just got JB4. Trust issues as far as damage or what? Beefer has been running JB4 probably the longest on this forum with no issues.
 
so all the ecu flashes so far are more for a 91-93 octane set up? and they are achieving roughly the same boost as the jb4 on a lower octane rating?

Essentially, yes.


Crushing my dreams Todd. Just got JB4. Trust issues as far as damage or what? Beefer has been running JB4 probably the longest on this forum with no issues.


I'm sorry!! No damage. My JB4 has been great for what it is. But I cannot make the same power as an ECU flash as I'm limited to 92 octane pump gas. Sure, I could use WMI but methanol has a nasty effect on engine internals (via oil thinning, also showing similar long term effects as detonation, according to one study), so I don't really trust it, nor do I trust that it will evenly distribute between all cylinders all the time. E85 would work, but I don't have any close by, nor do I want the inconveniences of mixing fuels especially in this state where I can't pump my own gas.

So, I could continue to tweak my JB4 settings and take greater risks to make more power, or I can do it safely with an ECU flash all while keeping the factory safeguards intact, without any sensor spoofing potentially preventing said safeguard from performing adequately when making significantly more power than I am now.

Right now I'm hitting about 15-16 psi and my timing looks pretty good, but any more and I start seeing fluctuations. I can get more boost by having the ECU start with a more stable ignition timing table to keep the cylinder temps down. With either a Tork, PRESSERTech, or Kagan tune I will get above 18 psi consistently, without having to worry about my fuel.

I've been talking to a few guys directly on the Stinger forum, and they haven't been having much success trying to increase boost on their flashed ECU's with the JB4, unless they're using significantly increased octane, and even then things can get a bit wonky at times (ie ignition timing freaks out and goes all over the place), some have, on the other hand, been able to use IAT spoofing to get slightly more power and consistency. Other than this, it just seems like the JB4's algorithm is a bit more complicated than what many people think (which can be a good or a bad thing, depending on your perspective), as in, if you try to change just one thing, many other things will be affected, unintentionally.

So, long story short, for those of us that are octane limited, ECU flashing *can* be better in terms of safety. But that's not to say the JB4 isn't safe to begin with, if you follow Terry's recommendations then you're golden. Simply put, if you like to tweak things and push the limit, the JB4 is also a useful tool for that. But for me, I think I'm just gonna reel things back in a bit, because if I don't I know I'll end up blowing up my engine because I get addicted to adjusting things and it's only a matter of time before I push it too far, as the JB4 algorithm is more complicated than it seems.

I hope that makes sense. Not bashing it, just saying it may not be the best thing for me.
 
so they cant tell that your oem file has been duplicated. but ive read there will be data missing. like logs and mileage and that the ecu is recording


I think a dealership would only do this if they essentially don't trust you, and are trying to find excuses not to do warranty work. It would take a fair amount of digging to find that information. Supposedly they can also find evidence of a piggyback if they look really really close...but, that is debatable (nor do I know one way or another if it's true or not).

Most likely a dealer would take the quickest route to a diagnosis. They mostly just want to know what is wrong, not necessarily *why* it's wrong. Again, I think they'd only do such sleuthing if they were trying to find excuses, or they were just super thorough with a ton of time on their hands.

Just my opinion. I could very well be wrong on that (though obviously I don't think I am, haha).
 
If the Tork tune that is around 20 psi on 93 I think that’s the route I’d go honestly. Or presser tech but I thought I read your post saying it was between 15-20 that’s a big variation in my opinion lol. I’m roughly 19-21 psi on map 5 according to the jb4 and I love how it pulls. If I could get that without the trouble of driving across town for mixing e85 I’d probably jump on it
 
If the Tork tune that is around 20 psi on 93 I think that’s the route I’d go honestly. Or presser tech but I thought I read your post saying it was between 15-20 that’s a big variation in my opinion lol. I’m roughly 19-21 psi on map 5 according to the jb4 and I love how it pulls. If I could get that without the trouble of driving across town for mixing e85 I’d probably jump on it

Agreed, a very big variation in boost from PRESSERTech. But, we can assume it would run high whenever it's safe to do so, probably from good IAT's, so a nice intercooler could probably make things more worthwhile with that tune. (Just a guess on my part).

I heard that Tork is running into fueling restrictions from their Stage 2 tune, and subsequently relying on meth injection to substitute the needed fuel. I'm not sure how they're gonna get around it at this point. Supposedly a guy on the Stinger forum (Tonkabob) is running a custom stage 1.5 tune, and he is getting damn good 1/4 times with it. Maybe if I nag Tork they'll finally respond, and maybe I could convince them to give me that same tune he's running. Haha.
 
Agreed, a very big variation in boost from PRESSERTech. But, we can assume it would run high whenever it's safe to do so, probably from good IAT's, so a nice intercooler could probably make things more worthwhile with that tune. (Just a guess on my part).

I heard that Tork is running into fueling restrictions from their Stage 2 tune, and subsequently relying on meth injection to substitute the needed fuel. I'm not sure how they're gonna get around it at this point. Supposedly a guy on the Stinger forum (Tonkabob) is running a custom stage 1.5 tune, and he is getting damn good 1/4 times with it. Maybe if I nag Tork they'll finally respond, and maybe I could convince them to give me that same tune he's running. Haha.
Ya I was looking at that too. Sadly I’m not awd like tonka is running. Last night I did get my best 60’ and 1/4 but still not as quick as everyone else’s Rwd problems. If you can get them to release a 1.5 to others I might consider it. But I need another vehicle to get to work in for the time my car is down
 
Looking to update and upgrade your Genesis luxury sport automobile? Look no further than right here in our own forum store - where orders are shipped immediately!
Ya I was looking at that too. Sadly I’m not awd like tonka is running. Last night I did get my best 60’ and 1/4 but still not as quick as everyone else’s Rwd problems. If you can get them to release a 1.5 to others I might consider it. But I need another vehicle to get to work in for the time my car is down


You could always use Lyft. I did a number of times when my car was out of commission - in fact, I did enough to develop a couple pet peeves from their drivers. Lol.

Either way, it's still worth waiting to see what Kagan ends up doing. I'll have to shoot him some more emails with questions. Haha.
 
You could always use Lyft. I did a number of times when my car was out of commission - in fact, I did enough to develop a couple pet peeves from their drivers. Lol.

Either way, it's still worth waiting to see what Kagan ends up doing. I'll have to shoot him some more emails with questions. Haha.
What else are you trying to figure out?
 
What else are you trying to figure out?


I want more details about his 91 octane tune, and the potential of a 91 octane compatible stage 2 tune. Also, any progress with CANBus flashing.
 
Just heard back from PRESSERTech after I asked for more details about their tune.

When asked about boost and AFR's, he replied..



Scott also told me that any re-tunes or going back to stock will come at no cost, other than shipping.

I'm leaning towards the PRESSERTech tune primarily because I can't get Tork to respond to any of my emails. I have no doubt that the Tork tune is great, but, I'd prefer to go with a company that takes care of their customers, and responds to their emails at least.


Just a small update. I asked Scott (from PRESSERTech) about any changes to torque limits, and he said that it's one of the first things they do.

Considering all of the info I've gathered, it really sounds like the PRESSERTech tune is quite the comprehensive overhaul. With it we can potentially see very high, almost maxed out boost level, use large gapped spark plugs, have access to more power when at low speeds (due to torque limits being raised), and have potentially quicker shifts - all while still keeping a responsible level of safety intact.

Their tune isn't cheap, but the more I hear about it, the more I like it. It also is helpful for them to be so responsive to my questions.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top