That's very interesting because 2009 and 2011 suspension is the same. Placebo effect?
My understanding is the 2009 suspensions were different than the current suspensions.
http://www.genesisowners.com/hyundai-genesis-forum/showthread.php?t=5400
That's very interesting because 2009 and 2011 suspension is the same. Placebo effect?
My understanding is the 2009 suspensions were different than the current suspensions.
http://www.genesisowners.com/hyundai-genesis-forum/showthread.php?t=5400
Like more planted feeling and still be able to absorb bumps well?Having had both I can tell you for sure they are quite different (in a good way).
My understanding is the 2009 suspensions were different than the current suspensions.
http://www.genesisowners.com/hyundai-genesis-forum/showthread.php?t=5400
I think someone mentioned that after changing suspensions in 2010, they reverted back to 2009 suspension for the 2011 models.
You are kidding right? Some of the members here spent thousands to get the newer 2010 suspension. Some even threatened law suits because of the 2009 setup. The 2009 suspension was a major gripe and did definitely not come back in the 2011 model.
Subtle humor tends to fly right over the heads of some peopleYou are kidding right? Some of the members here spent thousands to get the newer 2010 suspension. Some even threatened law suits because of the 2009 setup. The 2009 suspension was a major gripe and did definitely not come back in the 2011 model.
Good info everyone. Thanks for the comments. I was leaning towards the V6, but now I will go with the V-8. Next question is the leather.
You can't go wrong with black, however, the saddle is distinctive and adds a special touch, but it might not be for everyone.
Those of you who have the saddle, are you glad you got it or regretting you didn't just go for the simple black? And what do guests think of it?
I purposely chose the 3.8 because I preferred the way it rides and handles over the 4.6; I chose Premium w/Nav and no tech because a) so many service problems that owners report involve the tech package/dis/head unit, etc., and b) the tech package doesn't include anything that I wanted enough to pay extra for.
Seems to me if the numbers are close enough not to be an issue then it just becomes a matter of preference. I'm sure you won't be disappointed with either choice - the cars are really not that much different. As I said, I liked the way the 6 felt a little better than the 8, and I'm totally happy with the 6. If I had the 8 I would probably be just as happy. Why not drive both again, both during the same visit to the dealer if possible, just for another comparison, then flip a coin - heads you win; tails you don't lose. .Folks,
I've been going through paralysis by analysis over the 3.8 Tech Pack vs 4.6 (with tech) question. I know the exact color interior and exterior I want. I work from home so my commute is zero and I put ~5000 miles a year on a car (I primarily fly on vacations). I was leaning toward the V6 because of the better "feel" around town, the slightly better gas mileage, and living in the northeast the 52/48 weight ratio on the V6 would be a benefit in the winter, especially with real snow tires. But when I look at some of the financial aspects, the V8 seems to make more sense.
I have found two dealers in MD where I can get a 2011 V8 for ~$37.5K and I can get a 2011 V6 w/tech through Hyundai Circle pricing for ~$36.5K. In both cases, it takes into account my current car is a Nissan Maxima.
I also checked the used car values on kbb.com of a 2009 and 2010 3.8 Tech Pack and 4.6 (with tech), both with 5000 miles and in excellent condition The numbers show that a 2010 is worth $4500-5000 more than an equivalent 2009, and a V8 w/tech is worth $4500-5000 more than a V6 w/tech from the same year. I also reran the numbers w/10000 miles and the results were very similar. Therefore this tells me that it is financially to my advantage to go with the V8 due to the resale value, and since I haven't found a dealer that is willing to substantially mark down a 2010 compared to a 2011, it makes a lot more sense to go with a 2011.
By the way, my insurance quote for a 2010 is V6:$333, V8:$359, and 2011 is V6:$337 and V8:$381. Therefore there is no real penalty for the V8 or for a 2011 vs. 2010.
Therefore, as much as a I was planning to get a V6, it appears to make more sense to go for a 2011 V8.
Am I missing something? For example, is the expected maintenance cost of a V8 Genesis that much higher than V6?
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.