- Joined
- Jun 10, 2010
- Messages
- 1,058
- Reaction score
- 125
- Points
- 63
- Location
- SC
- Genesis Model Type
- Genesis G70
The car lovers social network
Automotive components
Create videos that captivate
Automotive Hot or Not
Vehicle hacker protection
Genesis parts & accessories
Advertise with us!
The car lovers social network
Automotive components
Create videos that captivate
Automotive Hot or Not
Vehicle hacker protection
Genesis parts & accessories
Advertise with us!

So what's the rule of thumb? The 2012 Genesis is on my short list, is it wise to buy one if there's going to be a re-design next year?
First, unless Hyundai announces changes, "a bird in hand"...
And more importantly, will a new model still include the Lexicon?
True, waiting may mean buying the 2012 a year later...a year where I could have been driving around with a smile on my face.
Looks like 4WD will be coming soon for the Genesis. I hope it is optional. I am not a great fan/advocate of 4WD. In my opinion its limited advantages are not worth the extra cost, weight, complications and lower gas mileage. 4WD helps starting traction, but, again my opinion, does little to benefit handling or braking.
I grew up in Minnesota where snow-packed streets were present all winter. We used to laugh at "4 wheelers", saying the only advantage was you could drive 100 ft. further into the woods before becoming stuck.
Seems like the article was not clear about when new Genesis sedan will be coming. They said 2013, but didn't say if that was 2013 model year, or the 2014 model year released in fall of 2013. Of course, such reports are not always accurate anyway, in part because Hyundai's plans may change on exact release dates, etc.I know 2013 is aways off, but any news out there about the 2013 Genesis sedan? Just curious.
wow, if it's a new model for 2013, hyundai is very fast with redesigns.
the current generation is only 4 years in the US, 2009-2012.
Looks like 4WD will be coming soon for the Genesis. I hope it is optional.
More "inside" information from YEH. It is great to have someone with such connections to Hyundai on our forum to keep us abreast of things coming in the future.Remember, while a 2009MY, the Genesis went on sale in the US in 2008.
The Genesis has a 5 yr cycle so it's right on track.
The 2013 signifies year of launch and doesn't necessarily correlate to MY.
Will likely launch in Korea early in the year w/ the US launch mid-late 2013 as a 2014MY.
Will be optional [AWD].
More "inside" information from YEH. It is great to have someone with such connections to Hyundai on our forum to keep us abreast of things coming in the future.
You and YEH need to get a room.
Can't you leave it alone?
In some locations those 10 days make a big difference for those with only one car available to drive. This is especially true if adding AWD option to RWD models like the Genesis. For example, few people in the Rocky Mountain states will buy a RWD car, not just becasue of the 10 days they need it around town, but also because of when they might be driving in the mountains in the winter. So AWD option will open new markets for the Genesis.AWD is nice- but to sacrifice fuel economy all year round for the 10 days you may need it?
Added service cost, etc.
I'll never cease to be amazed at the intractable viewpoint held by so many regarding the unsuitability of RWD cars in winter conditions. Taken at face value, all cars must have been parked all winter long prior to the late 70s/early 80s (when 98+% of all vehicles were RWD).
If you <1> install good snow tires, and <2> know what you're doing, there's no reason to fear driving a RWD car in the winter. None. It's essentially all there was for the first six decades of automotive history, and technology improvements (ala ESC chips that constantly monitor oversteer, understeer, yaw, etc.) have only improved potential RWD traction control in recent years.
But it's apparent that nothing can be said, nor any evidence offered, that will change the minds of those that hold the view that you cannot navigate snowy or icy roads without AWD (or at least FWD). I guess I shouldn't let it bother me, as it's their loss (that is, giving up the joy of RWD and accepting the handling compromises implicit in AWD/FWD).
People who live in Denver rarely use snow tires and find that FWD is adequate even in light to moderate snow. AWD is a nice to have, but not required. But RWD is just very unpopular in Denver, except for luxury cars when the owner has another vehicle they can use when necessary. I am sure there a lots of other places like Denver (it actually does not snow that much in Denver due to its semi-arid climate, despite popular misconceptions).I'll never cease to be amazed at the intractable viewpoint held by so many regarding the unsuitability of RWD cars in winter conditions. Taken at face value, all cars must have been parked all winter long prior to the late 70s/early 80s (when 98+% of all vehicles were RWD).
If you <1> install good snow tires, and <2> know what you're doing, there's no reason to fear driving a RWD car in the winter. None. It's essentially all there was for the first six decades of automotive history, and technology improvements (ala ESC chips that constantly monitor oversteer, understeer, yaw, etc.) have only improved potential RWD traction control in recent years.
But it's apparent that nothing can be said, nor any evidence offered, that will change the minds of those that hold the view that you cannot navigate snowy or icy roads without AWD (or at least FWD). I guess I shouldn't let it bother me, as it's their loss (that is, giving up the joy of RWD and accepting the handling compromises implicit in AWD/FWD).