larry'sown
Been here awhile...
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- Messages
- 267
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
$46025 for the 2.0T and $59995 for the 3.6TT. No pricing for the NA 3.6L and both prices include destination. Anyone interested?
$46025 for the 2.0T and $59995 for the 3.6TT. No pricing for the NA 3.6L and both prices include destination. Anyone interested?
No, not only too expensive, but Cadillac is still on my "no buy" list because of the government takeover which disregarded bankruptcy law, basically giving the company to the unions and screwing over the preferred bondholders.
That does not appear to be the case. According to the LA Times (known to be a very liberal newspaper):The Government made a Profit with GM. Turn off Fox News and Educate yourself.
I guess you are short on cash, and can't afford to buy some vowels (and consonants) from Vanna?Very Unimpressed by the "C" ...![]()
That does not appear to be the case. According to the LA Times (known to be a very liberal newspaper):
http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-taxpayers-loss-gm-bailout-20130607,0,3122760.story
Taxpayers' loss on GM bailout looks to be about $10 billion
LA Times
By Jerry Hirsch
June 7, 2013, 10:13 a.m.
The U.S. Treasury’s deal to sell 30 million shares of General Motors Co. will recoup taxpayers another $1 billion of the bailout money the government put into the automaker back in 2009.
All told, taxpayers have recovered $32.5 billion of the $49.5 billion used to restructure the nation’s biggest automaker. The government also still owns 189 million GM shares, worth about $6.5 billion at the $34.41 share price that the Treasury got for the batch of stock it sold this week.
If the Treasury is able to liquidate its remaining stock, as it plans to do over the next 15 months, at that price or above, the government will still be short about $10 billion on its GM investment.
However, Treasury officials say that the goal of the auto industry bailout was to save the industry and jobs rather than make a profit on the investment.
$46025 for the 2.0T and $59995 for the 3.6TT. No pricing for the NA 3.6L and both prices include destination. Anyone interested?
This is not a Caddy board. Please sell your junk elsewhere.
I didn't comment on whether it was a good idea to bail out GM, only on your statement that:Yes, the initial investment may currently still be down $10 B, but what you fail to realize is what would have happened without it. There are many other profits from other auto suppliers that are not being measured. Without the Auto industry, the financial losses would have been catastrophic.
To put it in perspective the Iraq war costs 12 Billion Per month!!! And yet we have a post about losing $10 Billion, without considering the alternative.
The $10 B will eventually be paid in more ways than one.
The Government made a Profit with GM. Turn off Fox News and Educate yourself.
The Government made a Profit with GM. Turn off Fox News and Educate yourself. The GOP has been busting Unions and destroying the middle Class for 30 years. If it wasn't for the Bailout GM would be gone, The bondholders would have gotten nothing and Hundreds of thousands of Jobs would have been lost. Do you know who Herbert Hoover was?
I suppose you liked the Economy better in 2008- 2009 ?
The Government made a Profit with GM. Turn off Fox News and Educate yourself. The GOP has been busting Unions and destroying the middle Class for 30 years. If it wasn't for the Bailout GM would be gone, The bondholders would have gotten nothing and Hundreds of thousands of Jobs would have been lost. Do you know who Herbert Hoover was?
I suppose you liked the Economy better in 2008- 2009 ?
I didn't comment on whether it was a good idea to bail out GM, only on your statement that:
We don't really know what would have happened if there was no government bailout of GM. Certainly GM would have gone bankrupt, but they went bankrupt anyway, so not sure what the difference would have been (other than the US saving $10 billion).
Every major US airline has gone bankrupt, except for Southwest Airlines. Going bankrupt almost always did not stop their operations or cause massive layoffs, it just allowed them to discharge their debts. These bankruptcies were done without government subsidies. Among the majors, only Eastern Airlines ceased operations (mainly because they could not get union concessions). Most major foreign airlines are government owned.
Uh, 'cuse me? I am not a salesman by any means. I was just curious to see who was going to check out the 2014 CTS since that will compete directly with the 2014/15 Genesis. While that is a lot of coin, I am definitely going to check it out and weigh my options.