drpearso
Registered Member
PS -- Does anyone know where i can get a schematic of the Genesis seat design, so i can see how it is built. I have looked online and cannot find it. Regards
Well, the seat issue is a real back breaker for me. I have owned 2 SHO's due to the seats. I got the 1st SHO automatic due to the seat with the best side bolsters you can get. I bought the 1995 SHO auto just so I could have the seats and due to the 1995 was the last year they had the side bolstered seats in the SHO.
Since 1995 SHO, I found that the 2001 LS lincoln seat would work if i did a simple removal of the lumbar plate, and bent the wire side-bars that support the bolsters. This allowed me to drive as far as i wanted with no serious spinal issues to a destroyed spine from many fusions/operations etc. I then bought a 2005 LS, and then got the 2006 LS since it is the last year it was built.
Now, i am really screwed. I sold the LS to buy the 2013 Genesis sedan, and now I cannot drive it without fighting it the entire time due to no side bolsters. I thought it would be fine after test drives etc, but i really dropped the ball here. Not sure what to do. Only have 2,356 miles on the Genesis. I really screwed up since driving was a way to relax and enjoy myself, but not now.
Any serious input regarding what I can do would be appreciated. DP
EXBMW: I am a earnest advocate & supporter of using the inversion table. But for me it is to late to use it. To many multiple fusions and also discs destroyed by surgeries in the 1980's (un-needed fusions & un-needed discs de-nucleated ). If I knew what i do today, probably could have had some congenital deformities removed and be fine versus 32 years of crazy hard pain, and side effects due to opiates for pain management. Keep using your table -- smart man to use it. DPDo you have enough vertebrae structure to benefit from using an inversion table? It has been an absolute miracle-worker for me and my multiple deteriorated discs and 30-year history of lower back pain, sciatica, and failure with everything else (never had fusion).
EXBMW: I am a earnest advocate & supporter of using the inversion table. But for me it is to late to use it. To many multiple fusions and also discs destroyed by surgeries in the 1980's (un-needed fusions & un-needed discs de-nucleated ). If I knew what i do today, probably could have had some congenital deformities removed and be fine versus 32 years of crazy hard pain, and side effects due to opiates for pain management. Keep using your table -- smart man to use it. DP
EXBMW: PS - I have to resort to sleeping in a really nice Sharper Image electric recliner that fits me like a race car seat, and reclines at the touch of a button. I need that type of lateral support in a car seat, and i know that, but I just screwed up this time with purchase of new 2013 Genesis. Great car, but really missed the ball on the seats. Everyone seems to be stuck on the lumbar adjustment versus trying lateral bolsters that adjust electrically or manually. They are so very simple to put on a car seat, and much much more pragmatic then other un-needed more expensive devices on cars. There really needs to be a paradigm shift regarding car seats. Folks that do not even know they need lateral support would be totally surprised with adjustable lateral bolster support. DP (keep using your incline table).EXBMW: I am a earnest advocate & supporter of using the inversion table. But for me it is to late to use it. To many multiple fusions and also discs destroyed by surgeries in the 1980's (un-needed fusions & un-needed discs de-nucleated ). If I knew what i do today, probably could have had some congenital deformities removed and be fine versus 32 years of crazy hard pain, and side effects due to opiates for pain management. Keep using your table -- smart man to use it. DP