How could you debunk anything....
There is no way Toyota had a crystal ball to know how many vehicles they were going to sell when they brought Lexus to market in 1989
What significance does the 3rd year that Lexus was in the US market have to Genesis?
Warren
Again, the issue isn't whatever sales were going to be, but whether the manufacturer had/has the
production capacity to adequately support the dealers.
Toyota had plenty of production capacity to supply the Lexus dealer network back then, as well as presently; Hyundai does not.
Even with the initial 100 dealerships plan, we're talking (based on last year's sales) each of the 100 dealerships selling around
50 vehicles a month - which is just adequate (but not for a dealership in a high cost area such as NYC or LA).
But Genesis isn't supporting 100 dealerships as initially planned, but
3x as much, so, on avg., each dealership currently is getting far less vehicles than needed to adequately support a free standing store, much less a brand new free standing store.
So, if Hyundai is to be criticized for anything, it's not adequately planning for increased production capacity (been saying for years that they needed a new plant in NA and not China - which ended up being a complete boondoggle).
Also, Genesis is a far bigger success in its domestic market than what Lexus is today in Japan, and even more so then when Toyota sold the LS, ES, RX, etc. initially as higher-end Toyota models.
The significance is that in its 3rd year, Toyota was able to support its smaller dealer network with over 90k vehicles.
Genesis is in its 6+ yr and still can't provide its much larger dealer network anywhere close to 93k vehicles.
What is not more expensive than it was in 1989?
The other part of that is that they built Lexus dealerships in luxury ( very expensive) prime property locales in 1989
Again, from what I see of Genesis they are not trying to enter the high volume luxury markets
So again..your points dont hold water, because Toyota did just that with Lexus
Even if we use your " allocation" point that just drives prices over over MSRP.provided the demand is there in the first place
Warren
But in certain markets (like NYC, DC, LA, SF), land is appreciably more expensive (relative to inflation), and auto dealerships require substantial plots.
Thus, why would any dealership/dealership group spend the $12-18 million needed for an all new dealership in those high cost areas when they don't have nearly the allocation of vehicles to even just break even?
Lexus dealerships were making a profit within a couple of years as they had enough vehicles to sell.
The difference is that costs have gone way up and Genesis dealerships can't presently get enough vehicles to sell to recoup that cost, much less even come close to breaking even.
That won't really change until the new HMG BEV plant is completed - which will build the GV90 and probably 1-2 additional Genesis models.
This really is a SIMPLE concept.
A new auto dealership, esp in a high cost area, is a capital intensive endeavor, so
need to move a lot of product to cover the costs.
Presently, Genesis cannot provide enough vehicles for dealerships to cover the costs, much less make a profit.
What dealership/dealership group in their right mind would be taking massive losses for
10 yrs?
We are seeing new dealerships built now (first in lower cost areas) as the supply of vehicles should be adequate when the new HMG plant is completed - so, only would be incurring losses for 2-3 years as opposed to a decade.