Strange how the computer didn't consistently judge high or low, it fluctuated. I wonder how the computer gets its reading compared to the regular math that we do.
25mpg isn't too bad on full highway although I'd like to see a bit more. The city one is probably more representative of how I'd drive, if not a bit more city so good to know the numbers are still roughly similar.
Not knowing for sure, but I would guess that it has to do with how the G's computer rounds the actual figure (in other words, to how many digits
after the decimal point), as compared to how we may actually enter the figures into a calculator. The discrepancy in the figures indicates to me that this is probably the reason. We would be more inclined to input maybe one or two digits (to the tenth or to the one-hundredths), and the computer may actually compute it out to 10, 20 or more digits--even though it doesn't show on the dash.
EPA estimates, and our own driving habits, number of passengers, terrain, use of air conditioning or open windows, whether in traffic or on the open road, etc....all of these things dramatically affect our gas mileage, small as the number difference may actually be....thus the 'wisdom' of a certain presidential candidate telling us to check our air pressure....when maybe it's "his" air pressure that should be checked....(and I'm not referring to his tires...).
I'm getting consistently 25-27 hwy., and approx. 20 combined. For a car of this size/power, etc., I'm very pleased. I got the same numbers from my slightly lesser-powered Azera (263 hp, 3.8V6 front-
wheel drive), and also from a previous Mazda Millenia (2.5V6...170-ish hp, if memory serves)...which was considerably under-powered, IMO. I should note that, particularly in the warmer weather (about 9 mos/year in East Tennessee), I typically drive with the A/C on. With the compressor disengaged in cooler weather, I would expect the numbers to improve slightly.
Dan