KusaKusa
Registered Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2018
- Messages
- 583
- Reaction score
- 464
- Points
- 63
- Genesis Model Type
- Genesis G70
Sure, 5.9s makes sense for the specs and in comparison to other cars with similar specs, but media outlet testing tells a different and consistent story of 6.5-7.4s 0-60mph. I don't think I've seen a media outlet test below 6.5s. Regardless of the specs, that seems to be the reality.^ that 0-100kmh time of 5.9s is logical, seams reasonable, and can be explained given documented specifications (i.e. hp/tq, weight, gearing, etc). note that this would equate to 0-60mph in the ~5.7-5.8s range.
the crazy data we are seeing that range up to 7.4s are what have me scratching my head. i understand conditions change, blah blah blah, but a reasonable spread should be a few tenths at most - not 1.5s - just like we are seeing with the 3.3T. i have yet to hear a reliable explanation - probably because on car forums most things are speculation.
also, the 240hp rating in Aussieland is curious. why would Genesis detune AU market cars? is this common? i thought those Mad-Max-loving fiends were power hungry. the AU Stinger 2.0 is rated at 244, which is also down from the NA market of 255. what gives?
one conspiracy could be that NA cars are over-rated and actually dyno at 240hp just like the AU cars, so that in fact the AU cars are not detuned rather they spec the accurate rating (i hope for Genesis' sake this is not the case). however, the impossibility of this idea is that the AU cars are rated at 240hp and still show 0-100 in 5.9s - whereas NA cars are rated at 252/255hp and have slower-to-much-slower test data than do the AU cars. I don't believe Genesis NA lists acceleration data like AU does, but we've seen enough reports by now that show slower times than 5.9s (for 0-100 kmh).
so, NA cars are more powerful and slower. i hope someone can explain that to me...
So then from there on a new note, Genesis claims 5.9s for 0-100kmph, and Genesis was pretty close in their estimate before with the 3.3T. Assuming Genesis is just as accurate and the old times are accurate, then the inferred conclusion is that Genesis tuned the engine better. Otherwise, maybe the assumption that Genesis is just as accurate with their estimate is untrue because the engines have different levels of consistency.