• Car enthusiast? Join us on Cars Connected! iOS | Android | Desktop
  • Hint: Use a descriptive title for your new message
    If you're looking for help and want to draw people in who can assist you, use a descriptive subject title when posting your message. In other words, "I need help with my car" could be about anything and can easily be overlooked by people who can help. However, "I need help with my transmission" will draw interest from people who can help with a transmission specific issue. Be as descriptive as you can. Please also post in the appropriate forum. The "Lounge" is for introducing yourself. If you need help with your G70, please post in the G70 section - and so on... This message can be closed by clicking the X in the top right corner.

Genesis G70 Reviews

I also have the 2.0T like C&D, and my digital odometer says I get ~390 miles after a fill-up. That's always been a positive in exchange for dealing with the 2.0T turbo lag haha.
 
I also have the 2.0T like C&D, and my digital odometer says I get ~390 miles after a fill-up. That's always been a positive in exchange for dealing with the 2.0T turbo lag haha.
I’m dumb haha, forgot they have the 2.0 and not the 3.3
 
I also have the 2.0T like C&D, and my digital odometer says I get ~390 miles after a fill-up. That's always been a positive in exchange for dealing with the 2.0T turbo lag haha.
The onboard computer is always optimistic that we’ll drive exactly 59 mph with no stoplights or stop signs and with the cruise control on. For the entire tank of fuel.

I see that C&D reports 25 mpg average. That’s probably a little more highway than city. Either that, or no spirited driving whatsoever.
 
I get about 336 miles to a tank with about 70 percent highway driving.
 
740km is the most I’ve gotten on a tank. And that’s nursing the car the whole week!
 
740km is the most I’ve gotten on a tank. And that’s nursing the car the whole week!
Holy Cow. Is that a 2.0L or 3.3?
 
Looking to update and upgrade your Genesis luxury sport automobile? Look no further than right here in our own forum store - where orders are shipped immediately!
^ that guy is pretty thorough, and generally takes a factual and logical approach to his analyses. all in all he presents a fair assessment.
______________________________

Help support this site so it can continue supporting you!
 
a quick personal 'review' after a road trip last weekend, as i posted in a separate thread where i gripe about not having a spare tire:

welp, made it through the road trip OK. 1100kms, 10hrs of driving, no blowouts or other mishaps. the idea of not having a spare did cross my mind several times when going over rough road sections and when a car in front kicked up some road debris. at first i thought it was a metal plate, but it was most likely rubber. had me checking my TPMS screen though.

the car handled like a champ. lots of 135-140kmh cruising (~85-90mph) in mountainous terrain over the Coquihalla Hwy in BC as well as a few wide open blasts (after dropping off the kids part way with their g/parents). anyone who knows the Coquihalla knows what a beast the passes can be - far from a flat or low elevation highway. it is a car killer - you can see evidence of where cars have caught on fire up the never-ending inclines. for those who don't know, this is the highway where the reality show "Highway Thru Hell" is filmed.

i saw 7.6l/100kms for the day which is 31mpUSg or 37mpg. happy with those numbers considering the higher than EPA speeds and i had 4 people (2 kids) and some luggage. i'd prefer longer gearing than what i have in the 6MT. cruising at 3000rpms+ was higher than i'd have liked and power was not an issue.

with the observed fuel economy, range anxiety of having a small 60l tank was nullified. a realistic range over 700kms at the speeds i was averaging is more than acceptable in my books. the 2.0T, while not an all-out powerhouse, did more than fine and i seldom felt under-powered. only one passing maneuver was more stressful than it needed to be. but that's because i was lazy and left it in 6th instead of downshifting. i also stayed away from Map 1 on the JB4 - left it in Map 0 (stock) for the trip to avoid heat issues.

on a side note, the 2.0T felt nearly as strong as my old G37S, with its 330hp 3.7L V6. that NA engine definitely lost grunt on high mountain passes, whereas the 2.0T compensates for altitude to maintain a more consistent power output. that, combined with more area under the torque curve down low, resulted in surprising performance for what it is. but even the 6MT trim's sport exhaust system (which gets us +3hp, ha ha) is no match for the G37S VQ's exhaust note...
 
Last edited:
Nice! I recently did a trip with the family in my 3.3T and got 7.5/100kms, however it was 100% flat. Given your terrain, it probably would have been in the 9s...
 
On the issue of fuel mileage, don't forget to keep an eye on your tire pressure.
 
That is a nice, detailed, fair review overall. Just noted two things I took issue with.
1. He kind of downplays the back seat legroom tightness. He didn't set the front seat to where a six footer would want it and then jump in the back.
2. Plastic shift paddles? I believe they are aluminum (or maybe they're so good they fooled me, lol).
Thanks for the link.
 
^ true. He was a bit generous with the take on rear legroom and foot room. Granted, i’ve not sat in the rear of an S60 or some of the other competition, but still, our rear seat leg and foot room is tight.
 
 
He corrected it in the comments. I'm sure he got an earful.
He also incorrectly states that the driving mode is saved once set. It's saved for every other mode other than Sport mode (at right around the 4:40 mark). For some inexplicable reason, Sport mode switches to Comfort Mode the next time you start it. It's minor and is something that only an owner would notice, but it is at the same time a tad annoying in the "big brother" nature of it.

To his credit he calls out the stock Michellin Primacy tires (on the AWD model). I'm going to drive mine until they're done, but I definitely won't be replace mine with the stock tires when it's time.
 
Last edited:
I think he's a good reviewer. Yeah, a couple slip ups but that is ok because he quickly corrected them. I like the he extols the virtues of the G70 over the Stinger but still prefers the Stinger himself. All good. Glad he later recognized the tires were the actual difference and that the G70 is the better handler etc..
 
Back
Top