I think everyone's forgetting something here (Correct me if I'm wrong). A BMW 340i is about 73K CAD before tax that has all the options the G70 3.3T Sport has, and the Genesis G70 is 58K CAD before tax, you can almost buy another brand new car with the 15K CAD you save. To me the price difference justifies a transmission that isn't GREAT or the BEST, but more like good enough.
Food for thought also, Genesis is Hyundai's new luxury brand, keyword luxury here. For Genesis luxury comes first, sporty comes second, so in terms of luxury, yeah the G70's transmission is great, the car is overall is amazing, it doesn't win Car of the Year by being a mediocre car. Now the "sport" part of the car, its great IMO, but when comparing to others like the M340i, M240i, C43 AMG, performance wise yeah it's not exactly there yet, that I will 100% agree. What makes the G70 so compelling and great is the price point, I've driven a tuned M240i, and I'll be the first to admit the transmission is better, BUT when I saw the price of one with the features the G70 Sport has, it's a no brainer which car I would pick, and that's the G70 3.3T. Call me poor, call me cheap, but the G70 is the best bang for your buck in the Luxury Sports Sedan category for cars.
Also comparing the G70 to the M340i, as much as their competitors, you also need to take into account that the 3-Series is on it's 7th generation, it's had time to grow, to be perfected, and it rightfully has, so you damn well know the car will be a great performing car on the street and on the track. Also it's a BMW, they live, breathe, and bleed motorsport. Even out of the big 3 German automakers (BMW, Mercedes, Audi) they're to me the most "sporty" As for the G70 it's on its first generation (yeah 2022 is "new" but its more of a facelift than anything) the car itself still needs to grow. To expect the G70 to be the best street and track machine right out the gate is a tall order that almost no company has done. Could Genesis have out-sourced their transmission to ZF? Yes for sure, but why would they? Let alone would ZF have given them the transmission to begin with? (from my limited research of vehicles/brands with ZF transmissions, they all have European ties) For a "new" brand with the backing of Hyundai, why wouldn't they want to use a in-house pre-existing transmission that works and is good first, instead of either out-sourcing one and telling everyone hey we're not good enough, or spending millions of dollars to engineer one that might be good? (Look at the flack the MKV Toyota Supra got) Yes, Hyundai has a DCT in the Veloster, but if I'm correct that transmission isn't strong enough to deal with the torque the G70 has, and it's also FWD.
The issue here I think is that the OP and ViR is stating the transmission is crap, or shit, or garbage, or that when you take it to the track it doesn't run. (Don't remind me about the videos that the OP posted in the first few posts) That to me is pure false. I've seen multiple G70's on the track, and even been to an event where they took us out in a G70 on the track, with a Pro driver driving. They said the car was great for what it is. Whether or not they were paid to say that or not who knows but for arguments sake let's say they truly meant it. So clearly the transmission or the car isn't shit, or garbage or doesn't run because there's actual proof that it does run, and perform as it needs. Now is it the best transmission or car for the track? Of course not, an M3, or a Camaro SS, or the M340i etc are/maybe better, but just cause something is better than the other doesn't make said transmission or car "shit". (I'm a mechanic at GM, driven 650HP Z06s, Camaro SS, ZL1, ZL1 1LE's and trust me GM makes sub par "performance" automatics IMO) For example, Chris Harris compared a Mclaren Senna to a Mclaren 650S GT3, 650S GT3 was a better track car because well it was built for the track but so is the Senna. But does this make the Senna shit? or that it has a shit transmission, or that it needs to replaced immediately and that Mclaren made a mistake? No, it's just that the 650S GT3 is 1. built for the track more so than the Senna, and 2. just better. Just because something isn't as good as something doesn't make it shit, or garbage, it's just not as good plain and simple. Is a Corvette shit/crap because it's compared to a LaFerrari? or is a Porsche GT3 Cup Car garbage because it's being compared to a F1 car? I don't think so.
And just to put this in the "argument" uhhhhh.... if we're talking about transmissions and track driving, why are we talking about automatics again? Isn't "manual" king of the track? and automatics are well "shit"?