amartz
Registered Member
And I also agree that Hyundai simply doesn't want to build V8s anymore because not enough people want them.
Well, if they'd but the V8 in the coupe, that might change things!
And I also agree that Hyundai simply doesn't want to build V8s anymore because not enough people want them.
Well, if they'd but the V8 in the coupe, that might change things!
Maybe it's just more politically correct "for the company" to say they're moving to smaller engines because of CAFE. It certainly sounds better than, "nobody wants the V8".
Just to offer a different take on "nobody wants a V8"...:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...=qRtDWSB3gEeyN0FL7EkLJw&bvm=bv.90237346,d.b2w
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...=XB7B8cEyIWHCDUeVb7g9Hw&bvm=bv.90237346,d.b2w
The V8 will never die. It is pure American muscle car heritage/icon. They will become rare and get much bigger dollars way down the road compared to a V6 equipped vehicle. Kinda like my 96 Mercedes Sl320, not many are looking for those, everyone wants the V8 version and are willing pay much more for the option.
The V8 will never die. It is pure American muscle car heritage/icon. They will become rare and get much bigger dollars way down the road compared to a V6 equipped vehicle. Kinda like my 96 Mercedes Sl320, not many are looking for those, everyone wants the V8 version and are willing pay much more for the option.
You mean small like a V6?![]()
Exactly! Mercedes-Benz just moved their AMG vehicles from a 6.2 liter V8 to a 5.5 liter twin turbo V8 to now a 4.0 liter twin turbo V8. 4.0 liters. Do you remember the GM 4.3 liter V6 of the 80s? Sure, you can have a V8. A 2.0 liter V8 in about 10 years.
The way I see it, it's important to enjoy what we have now and not concentrate too much on how bad the future will be. I tried, for years, talking sense into people about things but people just look at you like you're crazy. There is no hope. The way I see it, if people want to assume everything is fine - than they deserve what is coming to them.
V8s are nice but they're going away and stressing out about it, here, day after day, isn't going to change that. All it's going to do is cause people more stress. Unless that's the intended outcome, why keep talking about the same thing over and over again? Americans are too concerned with Football and Dancing With The Stars. Nobody cares about freedom or anything else anymore.
It's not worth stressing about. What's done is done. Enjoy what's left of the good life before something happens (for example, maybe your health gives way) and you cannot enjoy it anymore. Enjoy what little time you have left with the way things are NOW. That's what I do...
Enjoy it before the night comes.
It's a nice thought but it wouldn't change anything. All cars with the option of a V6 or V8 sell more of the V6. Camaro, Mustang, Challenger, Charger, E-Class, 5-Series, this, that, the other one. The cheaper one always sells more. Since not enough people are buying V8s, they're going away.
Maybe it's just more politically correct "for the company" to say they're moving to smaller engines because of CAFE. It certainly sounds better than, "nobody wants the V8".
I personally don't care whether Hyundai keeps the V8, or replaces it with a V6 twin turbo. I would not purchase either one, as the regular V6 is fine for me.Only calling out those who use the quotes in attempt to win a faux argument. If you were just quoting for quoting, ok..
The 3.3TT will be for the N-performance line and tKCB is stating that they were told around 480HP for this particular set-up (a bit skeptical - 440-450HP seems more realistic), so around 400-420HP for the Genesis sedan seems likely and not the 365HP that was seen in a prototype engine (which wasn't enough of a bump over the 3.8 V6 or to replace the NA Tau).
http://thekoreancarblog.com/2015/04/08/exclusive-new-hyundai-genesis-coupe-surpass-400hp-mark/
Now, this would make it seem that Hyundai is abandoning the V8, but if they are truly serious about competing at the higher end of the luxury/performance market, the TTV6 wouldn't be enough (a 3.3TT Genesis would akin to the CTS V-Sport and not the CTS-V or the M5).
So, the question remains, will H/K invest in smaller displacement/FI V8 to replace the Tau and be offered as engine in the Genesis-N (and not the equivalent of an N-Sport) and the top line engine in the Equus and K900?
And why have they done this? Answer is size is taxed and frowned upon by government and the general public who are to stupid to realize it's hp, not size that consumes. You cannot change physics, a gallon of gasoline produces X power no matter if it is blown or naturally aspirated. Good example is I pay a $141 large displacement tax every year on my plates, this goes up as the CC's go up. Here is a link. http://www.saaq.gouv.qc.ca/en/vehicle_registration/cylindersize.php My neighbour with his 3L twin turbo m3 6 cylinder which develops 425hp and 406lbs of torque skips this tax, makes perfect sense right? NOT. The manufacturers are also taxed and or penalized in the similar way through CAFE. In time when all the big displacement engines are less than 4L and producing gobs of untaxed HP they will want their taxes they lost and find new ways which will most likely be the weight/hp ratio, mark my words, it's coming.
Another good example is a Ford F150. One has a 5.0 and the other a 3.6 turbo. Both consume the same and are equivalent yet the 5.0 is penalized through penalties and taxation.
Hope to shake some folks out of their fog and at least admit, like you, the plight that currently is beyond our control.
I disagree no one wants a V8. If people actually knew about a V8 Genny, more would be bought. That is a Hyundai problem. If the dealers were on a whole actually better at local promotion and selling on site the Genny, any version, more V8s would be sold. There are so many models in the industry, this car in buried in a sea of irrelevant choices.
I disagree with everyone here. (Not really, but it is fun to say.)
I do not think that big, high-performance engine options are going away any time soon. Sure, the nature of those big engines may change a bit, but car makers will probably always have an option for a big engine in the U.S. market. The big engine options are halo cars-- few are sold relative to other choices, but they elevate the brand as a whole. BMW, MB, Audi still offer 12 cylinder engines. And Audi, BMW, Cadillac, and others are still playing with 16 cylinder engines. Before the V8s go away, we need to get rid of the V16 and V12 engines, and those do not seem to be fading yet.
I really do not get all the vitriol directed toward forced induction engines in these threads. It is as if the people ranting have never set foot in a car with a modern forced induction gasoline engine. (Diesel trucks don't count.) The current class of FI engines, that started hitting the market about 10 years ago, are massively superior to the normally aspirated engines they replaced. I cannot imagine that anyone would honestly want to regress to the engine performance of the 90s over what is available right now.
Personally, I cannot wait for a better engine than what I have now. I do not like the V6 as a daily driver-- it is torqueless at the bottom end of the RPM range. And it is noisy and unbalanced. You know what would fix it? An FI V6 (mostly) or any V8. Given the choice between the current V8 and an FI V6, I would choose the FI V6, because the incremental performance difference is not enough to justify the weight and cost of the V8. But, if Hyundai FIs the V8, then my next Genesis would be an FI V8.
And the rules coming today? V8, coal, virile white Christian men, nuclear anything, independence, oil, and anything dealing with liberty, are being ruled out of existence. This V8 verses big plumbing V6 issue is a microcosm of the larger picture (or many suggest a actual war effort against items mentioned being ruled out of existence). Just the way it is... No explaining that away..
I personally don't care whether Hyundai keeps the V8, or replaces it with a V6 twin turbo. I would not purchase either one, as the regular V6 is fine for me.
I am not trying to win any argument, although I am not sure why the CEO would lie about the reason for the V6 twin-turbo. I can sometimes see why Hyundai might lie about other stuff, but not sure about this one. If someone can come up with a theory as to why the CEO claimed the V6 twin-turbo is "all about CAFE" and that is not true, I would be glad to hear it.