Volfy
Some fava beans and a nice Chianti
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2010
- Messages
- 1,499
- Reaction score
- 1,375
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Gulf Coast
- Genesis Model Year
- 2021
- Genesis Model Type
- Genesis G70
That certainly could make a difference in the perceived comfort for a backseat passenger. Although, this sort of variances are precisely why mfrs and test agencies would use the H-Point Machine, which simulates a sitting person with properly-sized legs and feet, instead of sending an intern with a tape measure to do the job.Interesting. I had not heard of this testing standard. Thanks. I haven't read the linked article yet, but I wonder if it takes into account some more subtle things, like the amount of toe/foot room for the back seat passengers under the front seats? I think this may be one reason some cars seem roomier, despite the numbers.
Another tell-tale matrix is the wheelbase:
G70 - 111.6"
C300 - 111.4 to 112.8" (I believe the later models have the higher number)
M340i - 112.2"
They are all within an inch or so of each other. No matter how ingenious each of these mfr's engineers might be, there is just no bucking physics. These 4-dr compact sport sedans with roughly the same WB are all gonna share very similar interior dimensional constraints.
At the end of the day, a customer could walk into a Genesis dealership, takes a look at a G70, tells the salesperson the rear seat is too cramped, then buys a GV70. That doesn't mean the G70 doesn't sell because the rear seat is too cramped. It simply means that customer really wasn't even shopping for cars like the G70 anyway. That just reflects the general trend of the motoring public gravitating toward SUVs.
Now... if a customer test drives a G70, then goes to buy a C-class or 3-series, then that is a legit loss of market competitiveness.