• Car enthusiast? Join us on Cars Connected! iOS | Android | Desktop
  • Hint: Use a descriptive title for your new message
    If you're looking for help and want to draw people in who can assist you, use a descriptive subject title when posting your message. In other words, "I need help with my car" could be about anything and can easily be overlooked by people who can help. However, "I need help with my transmission" will draw interest from people who can help with a transmission specific issue. Be as descriptive as you can. Please also post in the appropriate forum. The "Lounge" is for introducing yourself. If you need help with your G70, please post in the G70 section - and so on... This message can be closed by clicking the X in the top right corner.

Genesis G70 Reviews

^ That very well may be, but Carsguide is an Aussie publication.

Btw, here's their G80 review.

 
that carguide review from aussie rates the 2.0T at 5.9s 0-100. not sure if this is test data or what:

View attachment 21102
They have a specific road tune for Aussie models. Doubt it is drivetrain. Mostly chassis based. My best is 6 secs stock.

179kw is 240hp. Are they using 87 Octane power rating?
 
365 hp is correct for the 3.3T

yes, exactly. the 3.3T rating for aussieland agrees with our rating, but the 2.0T is off by 15hp. something seems weird. not sure why they'd retune the 2.0T and not 3.3T.

i wonder what the Stinger 2.0T is rated at down under...
 
Looking to update and upgrade your Genesis luxury sport automobile? Look no further than right here in our own forum store - where orders are shipped immediately!
yes, exactly. the 3.3T rating for aussieland agrees with our rating, but the 2.0T is off by 15hp. something seems weird. not sure why they'd retune the 2.0T and not 3.3T.

i wonder what the Stinger 2.0T is rated at down under...
They normally tune them up and not down over there.
Must be a typo unless their official site also says it.
I suspect they are using 87 Octane numbers as the 2.0T was specced with lower Octane on the Sonata and Optima previously.
 
They normally tune them up and not down over there.
Must be a typo unless their official site also says it.
I suspect they are using 87 Octane numbers as the 2.0T was specced with lower Octane on the Sonata and Optima previously.

^ perhaps, but then why wouldn’t they have done the same for the 3.3T? Just seems odd to use a lower rating for one and not the other. Unless the 3.3T puts out 365hp on regular, then fair enough.

The official site lists ‘240’ (179kw) for the 2.0T, so no typo as Beefer showed.
 
Here is Part III...finale...

View all three clips in a continuous shot. Stripped of extraneous info and condensed into a 1 minute scene.
 
I assume G70 having the larger engine vs the 3-series model they compared to?

^ yeah, but they compete on price. this is where the G70 pulls away, literally and figuratively. people like to compare the 3.3t to the M340i for performance but in the real world there is a huge on-road price gap. easily $10-$15k. base prices may be similar but try finding a base M340i.
 
Gotcha, that's what I thought. thanks for clarifying
^ yeah, but they compete on price. this is where the G70 pulls away, literally and figuratively. people like to compare the 3.3t to the M340i for performance but in the real world there is a huge on-road price gap. easily $10-$15k. base prices may be similar but try finding a base M340i.
 
^ yeah, but they compete on price. this is where the G70 pulls away, literally and figuratively. people like to compare the 3.3t to the M340i for performance but in the real world there is a huge on-road price gap. easily $10-$15k. base prices may be similar but try finding a base M340i.

Base M340i still clocks in higher for the RWD variant than the AWD G70 Sport (or Dynamic edition for that matter)

I haven't read the reviews or comparisons, but I wouldn't doubt that the M340i has a significant performance advantage on the G70, so that may justify the cost. Probably wouldn't matter for most since the cars both operate in an odd segment that straddles the line for luxury/performance vehicles
 
^ you're probably right.

the base M340i xdrive starts at just shy of $64k in CAD. plus freight & PDI, etc,, which adds another $2500. the G70 Sport AWD is $58k CAD, including freight & PDI. we don't get a RWD option for either, but i assume the spread would be relative.

so, a minimum of ~$8500 difference before options on the M340i. it does cross the line ahead of the G70, but at a steep premium so it should be faster to justify the cost.
 
Back
Top