I believe he's referring to the ECU update which increases performance a little bit. This is for the 2.0 manual only, as far as we know.
Understood. I have the manual and never heard of it. Do I go to the dealer and just ask?

I believe he's referring to the ECU update which increases performance a little bit. This is for the 2.0 manual only, as far as we know.
Depending on the changes, it may just be done along with routine service next time you go in. If it was critical they would contact you. It is a performance change, not a safety issue.Understood. I have the manual and never heard of it. Do I go to the dealer and just ask?
Depending on the changes, it may just be done along with routine service next time you go in. If it was critical they would contact you. It is a performance change, not a safety issue.
I test drove the AT 2.0 a few days ago and was excited to finally find something comparable in handling to my 2003 E46. Then I located a MT and was dissapointed. I have a 2017 ND Miata and never expected the G70 to be as good. But I did expect it to be close to my E46. Not even close. Throws are too long and rubbery. The clutch range is too long and the bite point too high up. It is the worse MT I have ever driven and that includes ones from econo boxes.
One of the popular mods for the E46 is to replace the rubber clutch stop with one that has a longer thread and that made a world of difference when I did that back in 2003. Maybe we can do something similar in the G70?
On my Miata, I replaced the transmission oil with Motorcraft Synthetic and that made for even smoother shifting especially in cold weather.
So, I have driven manual's all my life. Swore I would never by an AT. But now seriously considering going with AT in the G70. Maybe I just need to go test drive it again. Or I just may keep driving my E46 (230K on it now) till it dies.

^ are you able to shed any light on the ECU update supposedly for the 2.0T 6MT trims? this was talked about by other CAD forum members, and the 'fix' apparently resolves some drive-ability issues and/or improves performance - possibly even adding boost. it was referred to as a recall but that should just be a TSB.
see below for a member's workorder when the work was done:
View attachment 19563
Great review on it, thanks for posting.I'll have to drive the MT again before deciding to go AT. Maybe the aftermarket will come out with a kit that makes it better. I just saw this review on the MT. I agree with his observations:
I will be getting my 2.0T Manual's ECU updated next week so I will report back to you regarding its drivability!^ are you able to shed any light on the ECU update supposedly for the 2.0T 6MT trims? this was talked about by other CAD forum members, and the 'fix' apparently resolves some drive-ability issues and/or improves performance - possibly even adding boost. it was referred to as a recall but that should just be a TSB.
see below for a member's workorder when the work was done:
View attachment 19563
That I don't know but I would presume the US would get it if it is related to drivability.And also if you know when the US will get it.
Has anyone tried to get this done in the US and been told they can't?And also if you know when the US will get it.
Has anyone tried to get this done in the US and been told they can't?
Thanks for the info. That sucks!I did. They told me they had no update.
i just picked up my 2.0t sport m/t. so after driving it almost 100 miles my impressions have changed. the shifting feel itself is not bad it's definitely the low rpm and rev hang that is ruining the driving experience. it just doesn't feel responsive.
There is also a power dip in the lower gear. I'm putting my JB4 and a short stick shifter soon. Will report back if anything changed.
i just picked up my 2.0t sport m/t. so after driving it almost 100 miles my impressions have changed. the shifting feel itself is not bad it's definitely the low rpm and rev hang that is ruining the driving experience. it just doesn't feel responsive.